tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20401985839632352152024-03-13T05:59:59.770+01:00piety is the keyTosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-81478018149588440382011-01-13T23:40:00.002+01:002011-01-13T23:44:51.278+01:00Referenzfigur als mythenbildendes Sammelbecken<div style="text-align:justify"><br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Prof. Dr. Tobias Döring (LMU München):</span> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" size="4"><b>"Doktor Faustus"</b></font> <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2011/01/hohlformiger-abkommling-der.html">pt 1</a></span></center> <br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 22 f.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Jesus Faustus – der Glücksverheißende</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Weiterhin fällt auf, dass Faustus sich mit einem dreiteiligen, latinisierten Namen vorstellt, was einer Mode der Humanisten entsprach. Eine solche Namensform galt als Programm, geradezu als Renaissance-Programm. Der Name "Faustus" ist dabei für einen Astrologen und Wahrsager zudem besonders günstig gewählt, denn er bedeutet zu deutsch "glücklich" oder "glücksverheißend", war also gewissermaßen Aushängeschild seiner Kunst.<br />
Worin diese Kunst genau besteht, wird dann im Einzelnen aufgelistet. <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totenbeschw%C3%B6rung">Nekromantie</a> <font color="#cc0000">ist die Kunst, Tote ins Leben zurückzurufen,</font> also genau das, was sich in der diskutierten Szene am Kaiserhof zuträgt, wenn der tote Alexander den Lebenden erscheint. Chiromantie ist die Handlesekunst, Hydromantie und Pyromantie die Vorhersage der Zukunft aus den Linien des Wassers bzw. aus der Gestalt des Feuers. Damit bietet die gesamte Liste einschlägige Hinweise auf <b>die sogenannten mantischen Künste, d.h. die Techniken der Wahrsagerei,</b> auf die Faustus sich, wie er hier ankündigt, verstand. Besonders interessant jedoch ist, dass dieser Magier sich auf seiner Karte als "Faustus iunior" und "magus secundus" ausweist. Was soll das heißen? Wer ist oder war dann Faustus senior, wer jener <i>magus primus,</i> in dessen Nachfolge er sich namentlich stellt? <br />
Darüber ist viel gerätselt worden. Frank Baron meint, es handele sich um Zoroaster, jenen Ersten Magier oder <b>Ur-Magier aus dem Zweistromland, Kulturgründer und Zivilisationsstifter der Frühgeschichte, der auch als Zarathustra bekannt ist.</b> [...] Dieser Faustus sagt von sich, dass er "magus secundus", d.h. ein Wiedergänger oder auch Wiedergeborener sei. Er legitimiert sich und seine Autorität also dadurch, dass er die Autorität eines Vorgängers borgt. Das ist genau wieder jene schon beschriebene Grundfigur des Renaissance-Programms, der wir hier erneut begegnen: <b>Das Aktuelle</b> sucht Vergewisserung <b>im Alten</b> und schafft sich seine Genealogie, indem es sich einen Vorfahren wählt.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 24)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>"Dabei stammt der Teufel aus Wittenberg."</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Dass Faustus einen regelrechten Teufelspakt geschlossen habe, kommt in den verstreuten Quellen als Behauptung zwar erst relativ spät auf, geht dann aber umso wirkungsvoller in die Überlieferungsgeschichte ein. Durchweg handelt es sich bei solcher Mythenbildung ja um volkstümliche und das heißt mündliche Tradierung, bei der mit jeder Weitergabe der Geschichte durch Nacherzählung Weiteres hinzugefügt wird. Dabei stammt der Leibhaftige als Faustens zeitweiliger Diener und eigentlicher Herr, dem er sich und seine Seele mutwillig verschrieben habe, wohl aus Wittenberg. Denn dieses zentrale und für uns entscheidende Motiv des Faustus-Mythos, das wir heutzutage mit ihm gleichsetzen, gelangt erst mit den Faustus-Erzählungen der Reformatoren zu Prominenz und Relevanz.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 25 f.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Luther siegt, wo Faustus versagt</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Schon an diesem Detail zeigt sich beispielhaft, dass <b>Luthers Erzählungen und Aufzeichnungen der wichtigste Quellenbestand für die spätere <i>Historia</i></b> bilden, die sich im Grunde durchweg als ein lutheranisches Propagandabuch verstehen lässt. [...] <br />
Beiläufig fällt bei Tisch der Name Faustus, was offenbar den Reformator motiviert, sogleich von seinen eigenen Auseinandersetzungen mit dem Leibhaftigen zu erzählen. Magister Faustus bietet Doktor Luther anscheinend willkommenen Anlass, seinen Tischgenossen zu erklären, wie er selbst mit dem Teufel fertig geworden ist: Gerungen und gekämpft habe er mit ihm, auf Leben und Tod, "aber mit Gottes Wort" sich letztlich seiner erwehret – gerade anders als Faustus, der sich von Gottes Wort abgewandt und dem Teufel ganz verschrieben habe. Luther siegt, wo Faustus versagt: So wird mit der Erzählung eine klare Grenze gezogen. Gleichzeitig allerdings wird durch derartige Geschichten die Faustus-Figur in den frühen, umkämpften Jahrzehnten der Reformation zunehmend enger mit dem Wirken der Reformatoren assoziiert – als Gegenfigur und erklärtes Gegenbeispiel zwar, aber dadurch zugleich als <b>Referenzfigur, deren heilloses Leben eine dunkle und dämonische Parallele zum heilsgewissen Leben eines Doktors Luthers darstellt.</b> <br />
Diese Assoziierung geht so weit, dass im weiteren Verlauf der Überlieferung, wie die <i>Historia</i> dann deutlich zeigt, sogar der Studien- und Wirkungsort von Faustus selbst in Wittenberg gesehen wird und nicht mehr, wie zuvor meist, in Württemberg. Die geographische Verschiebung aus dem süddeutschen in den mitteldeutschen Raum und damit in das Kernland des dt. Protestantismus ist hoch bedeutsam, weil sie die <b>kulturelle Verbindung zwischen dem Reformator und Faustus</b> enger zieht. Auf ganz eigentümliche und signifikante Weise werden <b>der Teufelsbekämpfer und der Teufelsbündler</b> damit aneinander, wenn nicht gar ineinander gerückt. <font color="#cc0000">Das ist nicht nur deshalb eine folgenreiche Entwicklung, weil sie bis zur wichtigsten Faustus-Version des 20. Jh.s reicht, dem großen Roman Thomas Manns, in dem die titelgebende Faust-Figur in Sprache, Habitus und Herkunft als eine Lutherfigur gezeichnet wird.</font> <br />
<br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:200%"; align="center">Magus <a href="http://www.zeno.org/Goetzinger-1885/A/Faust">secundus,</a> Magus <a href="http://www.deutsche-biographie.de/sfz15605.html">maximus</a></h3><br />
Grundsätzlich macht eine solche Assoziierung evident, worin die mythenbildende Funktion von Faustus liegt: in seiner Rolle als kultureller Wiedergänger. Mir scheint, dass die Figur deshalb zu einem Mythos der Renaissance geworden ist, weil in ihr, wie in einem Sammelbecken, die dunklen und dämonisierten Aspekte der Renaissance-Kultur zusammenfließen. Faustus ist ein "magus secundus", wie wir gesehen haben, d.h. ein Nachkömmling, ein Abkömmling. Meine Vermutung wäre, dass diese Figur in der kulturellen Gestalt, in der wir sie durch die diversen Texte kennen lernen, von genau den Autoritäten herkommt oder sogar abstammt, die sich von ihr abzugrenzen suchen: von Luther, von Melanchton, von Trithemius und den vielen anderen Geistesgrößen dieser großen Aufbruchszeit. [...] <br />
<b>Die Grenzen zwischen Weißer und Schwarzer Magie, zwischen religiös fundierter und dämonisch instrumentalisierter Beschwörungskunst sind prinzipiell sehr schwer, wenn überhaupt, zu ziehen – genauso schwer, wie man vielleicht den dauernden Kampf mit dem Leibhaftigen von einem Pakt mit dem Leibhaftigen unterscheiden kann.</b> In beiden Fällen liegt offenbar eine sehr intensive wechselseitige Beziehung vor, und wie sie jeweils endet, bleibt wohl länger ungewiss. <font color="#cc0000">Um solche Grenzziehungen aber immer wieder neu zu unternehmen, um Kampf von Pakt und Weiße von Schwarzer Magie zu unterscheiden, dazu wird, so meine ich, der Faustus-Mythos aufgeboten.</font> <br />
<br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:200%"; align="center">Jesus Faustus: Identifikations-, Projektions- und Deportationsfigur</h3><br />
Von jenem Wanderwahrsager selbst ist uns kein einziges Wort überliefert. Er ist ein Mythos in genau dem Sinn meiner eingangs skizzierten Definition: Er dient stets anderen zur Selbstbestätigung und Selbstbeschreibung, und zwar dadurch, dass sie sich kategorisch von seinem Tun und Treiben abgrenzen. <b>Gerade aber weil von Faustus selbst kein Wort überliefert ist, sehen wir ihn gewissermaßen nur als Hohlform,</b> im Zeugnis oder Urteil anderer und zwar zumeist solcher, die ihn kritisieren, verurteilen, verfemen und vertreiben wollen. Faustus ist eine Projektionsfigur, die uns gewiss größeren Aufschluss über die jeweiligen Erzählautoritäten, die von ihm berichten, gibt als über das, was sie von ihm erzählen. <font color="#cc0000">Wenn nämlich viele frühe Quellen, wie erwähnt, von der Ausweisung Faustens aus der Stadt berichten, d.h. von dem Versuch, seine Wirkungsmacht aus der christlichen Gemeinschaft auszuschließen, erzählen sie und doch in erster Linie davon, was diese Gemeinschaft kulturell beunruhigt und umtreibt und was daher unterbunden werden soll.</font> Somit aber erscheint Faustus meist als ein dämonisierter Wiedergänger, ja als Doppelgänger genau jener weltlichen wie religiösen Autoritäten, die gegen ihn zu Felde ziehen. [...] <br />
<br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:200%"; align="center">Kulturelle Ungewissheiten (um den 9/11-Mythos)</h3><br />
Das zeigt sich vielleicht auch an den eigentümlichen Namenswechseln, die bei der Überlieferung ins Auge fallen. Auf der Visitenkarte, die Johannes Trithemius zitiert, nennt er sich "Georgius", in der <i>Historia</i> heißt er "Johannes" und trägt mithin denselben Vornamen wie Trithemius selbst. Bei Goethe später heißt er "Heinrich", was sicher als Anspielung auf Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa zu verstehen ist, den großen Okkultisten, der ebenfalls als Gegen- wie Modellfigur zu Faustus gelten kann. Auf diese Weise mag der Namenswechsel ein weiteres Indiz für die Funktion des Faustus-Mythos sein, als Feind- wie zugleich Abbild strittiger Denker zu fungieren und daher denen, die sich von ihm abgrenzen, namentlich verbunden zu bleiben. Eins jedenfalls ist unbestreitbar: Dass Faustus über so lange Zeit so viele Geister der Renaissance umtreibt und so regelmäßig als Negativexempel dienen muss, ist nur verständlich, <b>weil in der Figur fundamentale Unsicherheiten dingfest gemacht werden sollen.</b> Sie dient zur Feststellung, wenn nicht zur Austreibung, kultureller Ungewissheiten ihrer Epoche.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 27 ff.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Im Schnittpunkt kultureller Kampflinien</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><font color="#cc0000">Der Mythos von Doktor Faustus ist, so lässt sich der Befund zusammenfassen, also ein frühneuzeitliches Krisenbewältigungsprogramm, d.h. der Versuch, durch volkstümliche Überlieferung für Orientierung und Absicherung zu sorgen. Deshalb liest sich seine Geschichte wie eine umgekehrte Heiligenlegende, und deshalb sollten wir bei der Lektüre, um das zugrunde liegende Krisenbewusstsein festzustellen, die Deutungsmuster des Erzählens umkehren.</font> Beispielsweise heißt es bei Trithemius, dass Faustus sich gerühmt habe, über ein so umfangreiches Wissen und Gedächtnis zu verfügen, dass er das Gesamtwerk der Philosophie seit Platon und Aristoteles im Kopf trage und dass er, falls dieses Werk einmal verloren gehen sollte, es auswendig wiederherstellen könne. Zur Deutung dieser Anekdote müssen wir bloß die Wertungszeichen umkehren. <b>Trithemus erzählt sie als Ausdruck von Faustus Vermessenheit und Prahlerei, aber was drückt sich darin anderes aus als eine große kulturelle Hoffnung der Renaissance, vielleicht die zentrale Hoffnung der gesamten Epoche, der großen antiken Überlieferung erneut habhaft zu werden, d.h. sich deren Wissen anzueignen und dadurch über die antiken Größen noch hinauszugelangen?</b> Diese Leistung der Memoria, die an der Faustus-Figur negativ markiert wird, stellt also im Grunde eine positive, vielleicht unerreichte oder unerreichbare, jedenfalls aber programmatische Kulturleistung dar, der sich jene Zeit ganz ausdrücklich verschrieben hatte. Ähnlich ließe sich die oft kolportierte Geschichte von Faustens Flugübungen deuten. [...] <br />
<br />
Als Exempel ist Faustus gerade nicht ein Ausnahme-, sondern ein Modellfall. Seine Lebensbeschreibung, kompiliert aus vorliegenden Schriften, zeigt damit etwas, das in hohem Maße typisch, weitverbreitet und charakteristisch ist für jene Zeit, so dass sich viele Leser darin wiederfinden mögen. <b>Bei dem "Fürwitz" nämlich, der auf dem Titelblatt genannt wird, handelt es sich um jene <a href="http://books.google.de/books?id=g_7MlydoXeYC">Curiositas,</a> die bald zur Leitidee der neuzeitlichen Forschung aufsteigt und signalisiert, dass hier fortwährend Grenzen des Bekannten und Erlaubten überschritten werden.</b> Die Grenzüberschreitung manifestiert sich mit den Entdeckungs- und Eroberungsfahrten, beispielsweise in die Neue Welt, zudem im konkreten geographischen Sinn: Sie erweitert physisch den Horizont, führt über die Säulen des Herkules, die für die Antike das Ende der bekannten Welt darstellten, hinaus und begründet dadurch die neue Wissenschaft. <br />
<br />
Von ihrem schauerlichen Ende her gelesen ist die <i>Historia,</i> wie wir gesehen haben, <b>ein streng didaktischer und streng lutherischer Traktat, der uns die Schrecknisse des gotteslästerlichen Lebens vor Augen führen will.</b> Von seinem Titel und Anfang her gelesen allerdings wird diese didaktische Absicht immer wieder unterlaufen, und zwar nicht zuletzt deshalb, weil die Erzählung ihren Lesern erstaunlich detaillierte Einsichten in all das vermittelt, was man mit solcher Curiositas erfährt. Das ist zugleich der Grund dafür, warum einige, insbesondere protestantische Städte das Buch so dezidiert zu unterdrücken suchten. Es bietet schlicht so viele Schilderungen magischer Kunst, dass fürwitzige Leser es glatt als Lehrbuch nutzen können, um sich selbst in dieser Kunst zu üben. <font color="#cc0000">Denn um zu zeigen, wovon ein frommer Protestant sich fernzuhalten habe, muss all dies ja erst einmal veranschaulicht werden. Daher ist das ganze Teufels- und Beschwörungswerk, vor dem im Buch gewarnt wird, zunächst einmal darin enthalten. Statt also Zeitgenossen von der Magie abzubringen, wird sie ihnen darin praktisch gleich vermittelt.</font> Solche fragwürdigen Vermittlerleistungen sind es schließlich auch, mit denen Faustus sich den Mächtigen der Welt andient. [...] Die kulturellen Kampflinien der Zeit durchkreuzen sich auf diese Weise in der Faustus-Figur wie im Mythos, der sie prägt. <br />
<br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:200%"; align="center">"Theatricality and deception are powerful agents."</h3><br />
Damit sollte die eingangs aufgestellte These ausgeführt und in ihrem Kern begründet sein. [...] Was bislang noch nicht ausdiskutiert wurde, betrifft den zweiten Aspekt dieser These: dass es sich bei solcher Zwischengängerei ausdrücklich um einen Akt der <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performanz_(Sprechakttheorie)">Performanz</a> und des Theaters handelt, dass Faustus also seine wirkungsvollste Rolle als Spielfigur auf dem Theater findet. <b>Die Kultur- und Religionskonflikte, die in dem Faustus-Mythos ausgetragen werden, lassen sich erst dann wirklich verstehen, wenn wir den Blick auf die Bühne richten,</b> d.h. auf Christopher Marlowe und seine englische Bühnenversion der <i>Historia,</i> die schon bald nach 1600 über Wanderschauspielgruppen den Weg zurück nach Dtl. findet.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 32)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Faustus-Mythos = Theater-Mythos (wie Jesus-/Mozart- oder der "9/11"-Mythos)</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Das Rollenspiel <i>des</i> Theaters wird damit zum Rollenspiel <i>auf das</i> Theater und zieht auf diese Weise das gesamte Publikum in den Bannkreis einer theatralen Selbsterkundung und kulturellen Reflexion. Aus diesem Grund, so meine ich, lässt sich der Faustus-Mythos zutreffend als ein Theater-Mythos auffassen, denn solche Selbstreflexion – was ja nichts anderes als Selbstbeobachtung eines Beobachters bedeutet – ist es eben, was das frühneuzeitliche Theater beabsichtigt und für die Kultur der Renaissance leistet. <b>Was der Faustus-Figur an magischer Macht und Praxis zugeschrieben wird, entspricht exakt der Macht und Praxis des Theaters:</b> Verstorbene zu neuem Leben zu erwecken. Im Rahmen der mantischen Künste nennt man diese Kunst "Nekromantie", was ja, wie wir an der Visitenkarte sehen konnten, zu Faustens Berufsbezeichnungen gehört. Im Rahmen des Theaters aber nennt man diese Kunst schlicht "Schauspielkunst", denn das genau unternimmt ja jeder Schauspieler, wenn er vor unseren Augen einer historischen Figur, die längst verstorben ist, für die Dauer einer Aufführung neues Leben gibt. <font color="#cc0000">Heutzutage scheint uns dieser magische Theater-Akt vielleicht nicht mehr bemerkenswert, für die Renaissance jedoch lag darin etwas ebenso Faszinierendes wie Beruhigendes</font> – wie ist es möglich, dass wir als Zuschauer mit einem Mal die alten Helden leibhaftig vor Augen haben – weshalb die Schauspielkunst in England in der Tat lange heftig umkämpft war und <b>gerade von den glaubensfesten Protestanten kategorisch abgelehnt</b> wurde. <br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-16199129396395801902011-01-11T23:11:00.005+01:002011-01-11T23:30:14.334+01:00Hohlförmiger Abkömmling der Reformatoren<div style="text-align:justify"><br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Prof. Dr. Tobias Döring (LMU München):</span> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" size="4"><b>"Doktor Faustus"</b></font> <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">In: "Mythen Europas – <a href="http://www.google.de/search?source=ig&hl=de&rlz=&=&q=%22Schl%C3%BCsselfiguren+der+Imagination%22#">Schlüsselfiguren</a> der Imagination" 4. <a href="http://www.antiquariat.de/angebote/GID11936302.html">Renaissance</a></span></center> <br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 14 f.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Marlowe">Marlowe</a> (und die Shakespeare-Urheberschaftsfrage)</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Was wir in dieser Szene beobachten können, ist ein Mythos der Renaissance – mehr noch, es ist <i>der</i> Mythos der Renaissance, der sich hier in Szene setzt. <b>In Doktor Faustus</b> und den seltsamen Erscheinungen, die seine Kunst heraufzubeschwören vermag, <b>sehen wir womöglich, wie die Renaissance sich selber sah:</b> als Erfüllung lang gehegter Wünsche, als Begegnung mit den selbstgewählten Vorfahren und Vorbildern, d.h. <b>als wirkungsmächtige Vergegenwärtigung der Antike.</b> Dass aber der damals Mächtigste, der Kaiser, dabei auf so fragwürdige Vermittlerdienste wie die eines fahrenden Gauklers und Gelehrten angewiesen bleibt, zeigt sowohl <b>das Faszinierende wie auch das Prekäre</b> des gesamten Unternehmens. <br />
Der Faustus-Mythos ist dt. Lesern ja zumeist in seiner dramatischen Fassung bekannt, d.h. als Spielvorlage fürs Theater, zumal in der umfassenden und tiefgreifenden Ausgestaltung durch Goethes Lebenswerk. Lange vorher jedoch schon, im letzten Jahrzehnt des 16. Jh.s, wurde Doktor Faustus bereits als Spielfigur auf die Theaterbretter gestellt und dabei derart populär, dass sie allenthalben nachgespielt und vielfach neu entworfen wurde. Ihren Ausgang nahm diese Bühnenkarriere seinerzeit in England, wo die Theater-Kultur in den späten Regierungsjahren von Elisabeth I. sehr viel höher als auf dem Kontinent entwickelt war. Umso aufschlussreicher ist es daher, dass in London um 1590 ein junger brillanter Kopf und sprachmächtiger Dramatiker namens Christopher Marlowe nach diesem brisanten Renaissance-Mythos griff und daraus eine spektakuläre Tragödie formte, die das Publikum förmlich in Bann schlug und ohne deren dramatische Errungenschaften – darunter so zentrale Bühnenmittel wie der tragische Monolog – beispielsweise Shakespeares <i>Hamlet</i> zehn Jahre später völlig undenkbar wäre. [...] <br />
<br />
Zunächst einige Erläuterungen zur Alexander-Beschwörung am Kaiserhof und zu der Quelle, in der wir ihr begegnen. Bei dem geschilderten Zusammentreffen handelt es sich um einen kurzen, aber sehr wichtigen Ausschnitt aus der "<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauststoff">Historia</a> von D. Johann Fausten", einer anonym veröffentlichten Lebensbeschreibung dieses Gelehrten, die 1587 in Frankfurt am Main im Druck erschien und auf dem Buchmarkt schnell zu einem internationalen Bestseller wurde. [...] <br />
Die Begegnung zwischen Karl V. und Alexander dem Großen wird im 33. Kapitel der <i>Historia</i> erzählt, das zugleich ihren dritten und letzten Teil eröffnet.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 16 f.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Umkehrung der Befehlsgewalt: <br />
Dr. Faustus und Dr. Martinus und eine biblische Geschichte</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Mit Hilfe jener Schwarzen Künste, die Faustus zu Gebote stehen, lässt Karl sich seinen lang gehegten Wunsch erfüllen und beugt sich sogar der Befehlsgewalt des fahrenden Gelehrten. Sobald er die Erscheinung Alexanders berühren will, weist Doktor Faustus ihn zurück – und Karl gehorcht. Wie ungeheuerlich eine solche Umkehrung der Machtverhältnisse am Kaiserhof für zeitgenössische Leser gewirkt haben muss, können wir vielleicht ermessen, wenn wir bedenken, dass Karl V. immerhin derselbe Kaiser war, dem Doktor Luther 1521 auf dem Reichstag zu Worms gegenüberstand, als er sich weigerte zu widerrufen. <br />
Was für eine Bannkraft ist es also, die jener Wanderdoktor namens Faustus ausübt? Über welche Autorität, welche Macht verfügt er, dass sich ihr sogar der Kaiser fügt? <br />
Gegen Ende des zitierten Kapitels der <i>Historia</i> gibt Karl dazu einen interessanten Hinweis [...] Das "Weib", an das Karl denkt, ist das sogenannte <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexe_von_Endor">Weib zu Endor,</a> eine Wahrsagerin, von der im Alten Testament erzählt wird. <b>Im Buch Samuel (1 Samuel 28) lesen wir, wie sie für König Saul den Geist seines verstorbenen Vaters aus der Erde hervorgezaubert hat.</b> ("Der Antwort <a href="http://www.thokra.de/html/goethe_16.html">ernsteste</a> ist doch das Grab.") Vor diesem Hintergrund rückt die Begegnung zwischen Kaiser Karl und Alexander dem Großen also in die Nachfolge einer biblischen Begebenheit. Das gibt uns einen klaren Hinweis auf die Parallele, die wir ziehen sollen, und damit auf die Genealogie, die auf diese Weise konstruiert wird. <font color="#cc0000">Genauso wie dem König Saul durch Zauberkraft des alten Weibs einstmals sein eigener Vater dargeboten wurde, so wird dem Habsburger Weltherrscher hier der größte Weltherrscher der Antike vorgeführt, Alexander, der damit – und das ist entscheidend – ebenfalls eine Vaterrolle übernimmt.</font> Alexander verhält sich jetzt zu Kaiser Karl wie Samuel zu König Saul. <br />
Aus diesem Grund kann man sagen, dass uns hier der Mythos der Renaissance vorgeführt wird, denn hier nimmt Karl als aktueller Weltregent in Anspruch, der Sohn, d.h. der Abkömmling jenes antiken Weltregenten zu sein. Die Autorität der Frühen Neuzeit versichert sich an der Autorität des längst Vergangenen. Das Alte wird geradezu heraufbeschworen, um das Neue zu legitimieren, oder auch: <b>Das Neue kann nur dadurch Anerkennung und Bedeutung finden, dass es sich als Wiederkehr und Wiederholung des Antiken inszeniert.</b> <br />
<br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Chiller; font-size:200%"; align="center">Leistung des Mythos</h3><br />
Das genau bedeutet ja im Wortsinn "Renaissance": Wiedergeburt. Und genau aus diesem Grund ist das Erkennungsmerkmal am Körper Alexanders so entscheidend: die Warze, anhand derer ihn der Kaiser identifiziert. Nur wer nämlich von derlei intimen Körpermalen weiß, ist mit dem Überlieferten offensichtlich so vertraut, dass er eine solche Genealogie in Anspruch nehmen kann. Die Identifikation des Anderen dient zur Identifizierung des Selbst, so dass die Ankunft des Neuen als Abkunft vom Alten dargestellt wird. Das aber zeigt nicht nur den Mythos der Renaissance, sondern überhaupt <b>das Mythische schlechthin.</b> Sich mit dem, was von alters her erzählt wird, zu identifizieren, sich im Hergebrachten zu spiegeln und darin immer wieder und zumal in Krisenzeiten vergewissern zu können, unsere je aktuelle Selbstverständigung also dadurch zu gewinnen, dass wir auf vorrätige Figuren, Bilder und Geschichten zurückgreifen und sie in unseren Dienst stellen – das verstehe ich als Leistung des Mythos, und das leistet für die Renaissance das große Repertoire der antiken Überlieferungen. <font color="#cc0000">Alexander der Große steht hier gewiss nur als Repräsentant dieses großen Zusammenhangs von Texten und Figuren, die aus dem Altertum in die Neuzeit ragen und die immer wieder neu und programmatisch anzueignen sind.</font> <br />
Die Frage also, die wir im Zusammenhang mit Faustus untersuchen müssen, lautet: Welche Rolle spielt dabei die Magie? Was leistet seine Zaubermacht für dieses Programm?</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 18 ff.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Invertierte Heiligenlegende mit inquisitorischem Garaus</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Der wohlverdiente Lohn für einen Teufelspakt – so viel ist klar – kann nur ein grausamer Tod ohne Errettung der Seele sein. Und tatsächlich, am Ende des 68. Kapitels kommt es genau so. [...] <br />
Als es tagt, treten die Studenten in die Stube, sehen aber keinen Faustus mehr, stattdessen bietet sich ihnen folgender Anblick: "die Stuben voller Bluts gesprützet / Das Hirn klebte an der Wandt / weil jn der Teuffel von einer Wandt zur andern geschlagen hatte. Es lagen auch seine Augen vnd etliche Zäen allda / ein gräulich vnd erschrecklich Spectackel." Das ist es in der Tat. <font color="#cc0000">Die gleiche Art Horror, wie heutzutage die Splatter Movies,</font> bot damals das Ende der <i>Historia von D. Johann Fausten:</i> Blut- und Hirnspritzer an der Wand, herumliegende Körperteile, herumkullernde Augen – ein besonders aufschlussreiches Detail, das genauere Betrachtung lohnt – und ausgebrochene Zähne. <b>Drastischer ist das Ende eines Sünders wohl nicht darstellbar. <br />
<br />
Genau darauf kam es offensichtlich an. Um dieses Endes willen wird die gesamte <i>Historia</i> erzählt.</b> Von diesem Schrecken leitet sich ihre Motivation her, das Leben des schändlichen Doktors für christliche Leser auszubreiten. [...] Es ist dieselbe Erzählweise und Logik wie von <font color="#cc0000">Heiligenlegenden, bei denen die Zentralfigur des Heiligen ja ebenfalls nur dazu dient, ein beispielhaftes Lebensmuster vorzuführen, so dass alles Geschehen sich einzig darauf ausrichtet, was am Schluss geschieht.</font> Bei Heiligen ist dies in der Regel der Märtyrertod sowie die göttliche Errettung ihrer Seele. Bei Faustus ist es umgekehrt die Höllenfahrt: Nicht der Herrgott, sondern der Teufel holt sich seine Seele. Auf diesen Schreckensschluss läuft sein gesamtes Leben zu. Die <i>Historia</i> – so lässt sich sagen – ist eine invertierte Heiligenlegende, d.h. eine Umkehrung der Wertungsperspektive unter Beibehaltung der erzählerischen Grundstruktur. Dieser Faustus ist ein Negativexempel, <b>ein Abschreckungsbeispiel, an dem das Schema der Heilsgeschichte <i>ex negativo</i> bekräftigt werden soll.</b> [...] <br />
<br />
Wer immer dieser Faustus war oder gewesen sein könnte, er hat jedenfalls keine Schriften hinterlassen und sehr wahrscheinlich nie welche verfasst. Dagegen gab es um 1500 eine ganze Reihe großer europäischer Gelehrter oder Humanisten, die mit Geheimwissen und Magie in Zusammenhang standen, darunter so wichtige Figuren wie Heinrich Cornelius <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Cornelius_Agrippa_von_Nettesheim">Agrippa</a> von Nettesheim, der Mediziner <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus">Paracelsus</a> oder der Philosoph Johannes <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trithemius">Trithemius,</a> Abt in Sponheim. Sie alle waren weithin anerkannte, wenn auch oft umstrittene Autoren, deren Werke über die hermetischen Wissenschaften große Wirkung hatten, viel gelesen und vielfach debattiert wurden.</span> <br />
<br />
<br />
<center><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">S. 20 ff.)</span> <font face="Lucida Fax" size="2"><b>Hermetische Humanisten – humanistische Hermetiker</b></font></center> <br />
<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%">Unter dem Sammelbegriff <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetik">"hermetische Wissenschaften"</a> versteht man das okkulte, d.h. geheime Wissen, wie es in der Renaissance verbreitet war und das landläufig als "Alchemie" oder "Magie" bekannt ist. Es speist sich aus antiken Quellen und geht zurück auf einen Bestand an alten Schriften, die unter dem Namen Hermes Trismegistos aus dem hellenischen Ägypten überliefert sind. <font color="#cc0000">Jahrhunderte lang befand sich das Zentrum dieses hermetischen Wissens in Byzanz bzw. Konstantinopel, d.h. am Ort der hellenischen Diaspora, bevor es nach der türkischen Eroberung dieser Stadt im Jahre 1453 – ein Datum, das oft als Beginn der Renaissance gesetzt wird – mit den vertriebenen Gelehrten in den westlichen Mittelmeerraum und besonders nach Italien gelangte.</font> <b>Dort gab, vor allem im Florenz der Medici, das <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Hermeticum">Corpus Hermeticum</a> die entscheidenden Impulse für das Aufblühen des Neuplatonismus und damit für die neuerliche Auseinandersetzung mit den alten griechischen Ideenwelten, die jetzt durch Übersetzung und philosophische Weiterentwicklung in Verbindung mit christlicher Theologie und jüdischer Kabbalistik gebracht wurden.</b> <br />
Durch das Wirken dieser Florentinischen Schule, die sich als Re-Inszenierung der platonischen Akademie verstand, und ihrer namhaften Vertreter wie <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsilio_Ficino">Marsilio Ficino</a> oder <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Pico_della_Mirandola">Pico della Mirandola</a> verbreiteten sich die hermetischen Wissenschaften auch nach Nordeuropa und gingen in die Kultur der Renaissance ein. <br />
Die genannten Humanisten und Gelehrten bezogen ihr okkultes Wissen über eben diese Quellen und gelten in diesem Sinne alle als hermetische Autoren. <br />
<br />
Einen <i>Autor</i> namens Faustus aber gab es nicht. Was an Schriften, wie es der Titel der <i>Historia</i> behauptet, "von" ihm hinterlassen sein soll, können tatsächlich nur Schriften <i>über</i> ihn gewesen sein. Davon nämlich gibt es viele und zwar schon hundert Jahre vor Drucklegung der anonymen <i>Historia.</i> <b>Bereits in den 1480er Jahren finden sich erste Spuren in diversen Quellen, die zumeist dem Umkreis der Universität Heidelberg entstammen, einem deutschen Zentrum des Neuplatonismus und der humanistischen Gelehrsamkeit.</b> Die historischen Hinweise verdichten sich nach der Wende zum 16. Jahrhundert. Immer wieder ist von einem Faustus die Rede und zwar zumeist im Zusammenhang mit Wahrsagerei, Astrologie, Beschwörungsakten und sonstigen fragwürdigen Zaubereien. Darunter finden sich übrigens etliche Aussagen, die das geographische wie kulturelle Umfeld von Eichstätt betreffen. <font color="#cc0000">An der Universität von Ingolstadt soll ein gewisser Georgius Faustus Vorlesungen über Philosophie und Chiromantie (das ist die Handlesekunst) gehalten haben.</font> Georg <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_III._Schenk_von_Limpurg">Schenk von Limpurg,</a> ein bedeutender Geist jener Zeit und später Bischof von Bamberg, der zu einem der großen Repräsentanten des Goldenen Zeitalters in der Kulturgeschichte Frankens wurde, hat damals in Ingolstadt studiert. 1518, als er glanzvoll Hof hielt, sollte er sich von einem fahrenden Astrologen namens Faustus sein Horoskop erstellen lassen und damit zum Auftraggeber des umstrittenen Wahrsagers und Beschwörungskünstlers werden. Zehn Jahre später berichtet Prior Kilian Leib aus Rebdorf ebenfalls über eine astrologische Expertise, die Faustus gestellt habe. <font color="#cc0000">Im Juni 1528 wurde er deshalb aus Ingolstadt ausgewiesen.</font> Andere Quellen sprechen immer wieder von angeblichen Flugversuchen, die Faustus unternommen haben soll, um seine Kunst unter Beweis zu stellen. <br />
<br />
Es ist bei weitem nicht immer klar, ob solche Hinweise jeweils dieselbe Person betreffen. Allein der Name variiert erheblich. Als aussichtsreichster Kandidat einer historischen Faust-Figur gilt ein gewisser Georg Helmstetter, auf dessen Lebensweg, soweit er sich in archivierten Spuren niederschlägt, viele der genannten Quellenfunde hinzudeuten scheinen. Feststeht jedenfalls, dass viele prominente Zeitgenossen des frühen 16. Jh.s einen Gelehrten namens Faustus anführen und zahlreiche Geschichten über ihn erzählen, die einschlägig auf Magie und Hermetismus verweisen und die später in erweiterter und z.T. erheblich spektakulärerer Form in der <i>Historia</i> wiederkehren. Zumeist sind dies – und das ist zweifellos bedeutsam – klare Abschreckungsgeschichten. <br />
Zu den prominentesten Vertretern jener Zeit, von denen wir auf diese Weise einiges von Faustus und seinem Teufelsverkehr hören, zählen beispielsweise die großen Wittenberger Reformatoren. <b>Luther kommt in seinen Tischreden wie auch Melanchton in seinen Sonntagspredigten immer wieder auf Faustus zurück. Beide wurden damit gleichermaßen zu den wirkungsvollsten Überlieferern seiner Geschichte. Mit den vielfachen Erzählungen und Erwähnungen in diesem Kontext gerät die Figur immer stärker in die zeitgenössischen Debatten und Konflikte um die Neuordnung der Kirche und der Religion.</b> Das sollte sich für ihre weitere Wirkung als sehr folgenreich erweisen. <br />
Spätestens seit den 1520er bis 30er Jahren wird Faustus zu einer protestantischen und polemischen Figur, die in den Auseinandersetzungen der Römischen Kirche mit der Reformation wie zugleich auch bei den Auseinandersetzungen innerhalb des Protestantismus oft und gern beschworen wird. <font color="#cc0000">Hätte es Faustus nie gegeben, so kann man diesen Tatbestand zusammenfassen, hätte man ihn hierzu wohl erfinden müssen, denn in den erbitterten Glaubens- und Machtkämpfen der Renaissance spielt er bald eine unersetzliche Rolle.</font> <br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-55977067375663190232009-12-14T23:57:00.006+01:002009-12-15T22:28:27.174+01:00Investigative Journal comments 3<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1287&cpage=1#comment-213">12/14'09</a></center><br />
"Separating one's head from one's body" – one of the finest examples for <a href="http://menofthebreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/12/wisdom-is-person-purity-preceeds.html">"final authority"</a> based on an unlucky book belief, isn't it. And wasn't it always that way within living memory … (without instant global communication). <br />
The "thing is too big" now? <br />
Why big? <br />
I don't think so at all. <br />
I mean, "the thing" doesn't play in such a category, therefore it can't be "big" or "small" or something like that. Those thoughts seem to me being pathetic traps, features of mind control by propaganda pathos of church/state/family upbringing into culture. In my opinion, an intellectual challenge should be seen as <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/09/this-is-our-crowning-glory.html">the most normal thing</a> there is. <br />
Then "have <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/224613/april-14-2009/the-word---have-your-cake-and-eat-it--too">your cake</a> and eat it, too". <br />
Was it too harsh? Probably too harsh to say to a shining example. <br />
The (quasi-)military mafia mentality radiates from the monolithic and monotheistic, bureaucratic, Catholic pyramid of church/state, educational, financial, and organizational power into the whole society (of Jesus) and puts its stamp on our entire culture. I mean, how many IRS agents <a href="http://edbrownvlog.blogspot.com/2009/12/who-is-sherry-peel-jackson.html">do the research</a> and how many just go on with their corporate military-bureaucratic Mafia job ... A corporate mainstream for careless consumers and a conspiracy mainstream for caring citizens – by splitting the mainstream, "9/11" made it possible. <br />
I believe, Ancient Egypt with its allmighty priestly Shepherd's Fold is their raw model for the coming global feudalist/communist administrative system disguised as a World God State or "Universal City of God". <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1284&cpage=1#comment-210">12/11'09</a></center> <br />
Oh no Greg, it's not <i>that</i> complicated anymore. <br />
The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lC_AStDUxA">Basic Picture</a> is absolutely certain and it explains all of the main aspects of "9/11", for example, very well. In other words, the fundament, I think, is done. And: there is a definite (if not ultimate) weapon against all agents of the world's "knightly" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Secretary">General Secretary</a> hidden in the dark and their centuries-old <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/meet-patriots-1.html">memetic engineering.</a> <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1268&cpage=1#comment-208">12/10'09</a></center><br />
<a href="http://911epicfail.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-york-is-new-jerusalem-and-this-is.html">09/18'09</a> Christopher Strunk on The Investigative Journal @30min) <br />
Let me give an overview so people understand where I'm going with this. <br />
During the crusades, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_I_of_England">King Richard</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_England">King John</a> had serious problems in financing their part in the crusade and what they did was to put England in (), and that's during the period of Robin Hood ("The name was still used to describe sedition and treachery in 1605, when Guy Fawkes and his associates were branded <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood">'Robin Hoods'</a> by Robert Cecil.") [...] <b>King John struck a deal with the Pope to pay off the debt. Basically, he gave up the sovereignty and used all of his future holdings as a security against the debt that had been occurred.</b> The point is the Americans were part of that, so the Vatican had a like a banker's interest in controlling everything that the King's colonies happened from that point on, so that where England went then, the Vatican went with it. And certainly <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22Henry+VIII+rebelled+against%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">Henry VIII rebelled against</a> that. <br />
Let me sort of finish my overview here. <b>So the point is that the Vatican operated from the get-go through the Masonic order and everything else at the colonies. And that it always had an ulterior money modus.</b> And that it was in partnership to that contractional arrangement, the treaty of () 13. And that the <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/words-1.html">Founding Fathers</a> were aware of the king's debt that was owed to the revolution. <b>And they were forced to write the Constitution as a debt repayment plan, a business plan.</b> And so I don't give the credence that you give to the Constitution, even to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articles_of_Confederation">Articles of Confederation,</a> other than there are people getting enriched "of the vehicles" in order to hoodwink a lot of general people "in the street". And that's going on now. But with that in mind, so that's sort of an outlook that I take into consideration. <br />
And if you look at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States)">Social Security</a> system – that is a corporate fiction which you're enslaved by. That you were given a number and that number is controlled through the <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm">International Monetary Fund</a> and the <a href="http://www.worldbank.org">World Bank,</a> and the <a href="http://untreaty.un.org/English/overview.asp">United Nations Treaties</a> oversee that. And the monarchy in England and the Vatican threw that original structure – they are both involved in the corporate structure in the U.S. [and Canada]. You can't escape from that. <br />
<b>What I'm looking at, specifically, is the legal structure which is set up from that arrangement. You know,</b> <a href="http://the-conspiracy-is-us.blogspot.com/2009/09/they-want-to-be-slaves.html">if you're gonna fight</a> <b>a war, you're gonna use the same sword that your enemy is using, because it's got two edges. And you cut your enemy with the same sword that they would cut you with.</b> <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1279&cpage=1#comment-207">12/10'09</a></center><br />
I don't believe the <a href="http://the-conspiracy-is-us.blogspot.com/2009/12/happy-birthday-dear-sir-ejp.html">special power</a> of the Computerweb lies in missionizing, Greg. No, definitely not, and that for a lot of reasons. Let it to Alex, their "9/11" Joker and false flag cheap-Jack of the N.W.O., that false flag <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flBpsyFbEOs&fmt=18">Lewis Prothero,</a> never mentioning the <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22Universal+City+of+God%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">"Universal City of God"</a> or the <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22Civilization+of+Love%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">"Civilization of Love".</a> Let it to him to preach like an end-of-the-world priest. Let it to him to preach like a fanatic. You never did that, of course, don't get me wrong, I'm just talking about the principle here: If you want to be or think of yourself of being <i>"more"</i> than just a student resp. teacher, I'd presume you have generally already lost (a bit of) your standing within the online research community. For example, how many public correspondences have you done over the last years? I'm asking because the most astonishing thing about the cyberspace for me is that (almost?) no one uses it to conduct a conversation in public, you know. Why is that? Maybe you can imagine what kind of answer would probably follow from a piety-theoretical, piety-scientific viewpoint. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1268&cpage=1#comment-206">12/10'09</a></center><br />
What <a href="http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer97/secular.html">Jim Walker</a> found out: <br />
Much of the myth of Washington's alleged Christianity came from Mason Weems influential book "Life of Washington". The story of the cherry tree comes from this book and it has no historical basis. Weems, a Christian minister portrayed Washington as a devout Christian, yet Washington's own diaries show that he rarely attended Church. <br />
<b>Washington revealed almost nothing to indicate his spiritual frame of mind, hardly a mark of a devout Christian. In his thousands of letters, the name of Jesus Christ never appears.</b> He rarely spoke about his religion, but his Freemasonry experience points to a belief in deism. Washington's initiation occurred at the Fredericksburg Lodge on 4 November 1752, later becoming a Master mason in 1799, and remained a freemason until he died. <br />
<b>To the United Baptist Churches in Virginia in May, 1789, Washington said that every man "ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience."</b> <br />
After Washington's death, Dr. Abercrombie, a friend of his, replied to a Dr. Wilson, who had interrogated him about Washington's religion replied, "Sir, Washington was a Deist." <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1033&cpage=1#comment-72">03/31'09</a></center> <blockquote><p><a href="http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=messageboard.viewThread&entryID=49822360&groupID=100001389&adTopicID=16">When a newsman on CNN exposes the N.W.O.,</a> you can be sure there is a planned revolution coming up in the US. Alex Jones is a big part of it. I got tired of O.G. shouting it because to me it's obvious, but it seems it's not that obvious to everybody. I mean, come on, how could Alex Jones enter the secretive Bohemian Grove if he had not been invited before. Those images were meant to inflame American Christians and to put before their eyes a Satanic flavored conspiracy. Watch closely the movie "A Scanner Darkly". Alex Jones appears in it exactly as he is: a false prophet. Also you can find in the same movie Templar and Masonic symbolism in the house. I don't listen to Jones but I bet he even bitches about Hollywood, then turns his back and goes collaborating with the industry.</p></blockquote><a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/ericindiana-aka-orwells-ghost.html">O.G.'s</a> response on January 1, 2008) <br />
You are absolutely correct. <b>He wants to give the impression they are Satanists and not Christians that are observing Christianity's pagan heritage.</b> Simple as that. <br />
Like <a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/colt37/Catholicism01.jpg">this pic</a> Alex excludes in his documentary and archives of the grove. If you check out the history of <a href="http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/index.html">Sonoma County</a> you will see it was established by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_San_Francisco_Solano">Mission San Francisco Solano</a> and the Franciscan missionaries. Which would explain <a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/colt37/Catholicism02.jpg">this pic</a> Alex also conveniently excludes. That is either a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franciscan">Franciscan friar</a> or someone dressed as one, notice pious robes and the bare feet. They were every bit as extreme as the Jesuits even though I spend more time talking about the Jesuits, the Franciscans have their own sordid history as well. <br />
<font color="#cc0000">I have reason to believe Nancy Pelosi is a Franciscan sister. I found historical evidence that showed there was a Franciscan by the name of Father Pelosi during the early foundations of this country that settled in Pennsylvania, and he noted the devoted work of the newly incorporated Franciscan sisters and their hard efforts. I think her husband Paul Pelosi comes from that lineage, but Paul was educated at Jesuit Georgetown University, so there is that too. She made a comment that she was Franciscan to the core, which I founded remarkably similar to the comment the Pope had made just shortly before, that he was Bavarian to the core, which may have been an indication that he was Bavarian Illuminati, which would be to say he was Jesuit.</font> <br />
<a href="http://www.sjweb.info/35/gc35_photobank/09_official_pictures/original_size/official_03.jpg">Which could be the reason the current Black Pope can go ahead and step down from his lifelong appointed position later this month</a>. Plus one of the duties of a Franciscan Sister is that they remain a stay at home mom until the very last fledgling is out of the nest, which is what happened with <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/politics/2006/11/07/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-nancy-pelosi.html">Nancy (#6)</a>. <b>Which would mean, our choices for Speaker of the House was between the Franciscan Nancy Pelosi and the Jesuit John Boehner, just like we had two Skull and Bones members to choose from.</b> And Skull and Bones is really just a recruiting ground for the Jesuits. <br />
<br />
And the reason I spend so much time talking about Alex Jones is that he is a huge detriment to any form of ultimate truth. <b>People accredit him for waking them up, but that's not necessarily true, because they were the ones already out looking for truth and he was the one poised to give them all the answers they were looking for.</b> <font color="#cc0000">And if it's anti-government information you are looking for, Alex pulls few punches. But when it comes to exposing the real perpetrators that have the actual means to pull off all the manipulation required and the devotion for the primary members to keep it all secret ... that's when he resorts to his talk about anonymous, shadowy, Luciferian Controllers</font>. <br />
Now <a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v228/colt37/StJohnNepomuk.jpg">this guy</a> could <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Nepomuk">keep a secret</a>. <br />
<blockquote><p><b>The legend is especially indebted for its growth to the Jesuit historiographer Boleslaus Balbinus</b>, the "Bohemian Pliny", whose <i>Vita beati Joannis Nepomuceni martyris</i> was published in Prague, 1670. Although the Prague metropolitan chapter did not accept the biography dedicated to it, "as being frequently destitute of historical foundation and erroneous, a bungling work of mythological rhetoric," Balbinus stuck to it. In 1683 the Charles Bridge was adorned with a statue of the saint, which has had numerous successors. In 1708 the first church was dedicated to him at Hradec Králové, a more famous Pilgrimage Church of Saint John of Nepomuk was founded in 1719. Meanwhile, in spite of the objection of the Jesuits, the process was inaugurated which ended with his canonization. On May 31, 1721, he was beatified, and on March 19, 1729, he was canonized under Pope Benedict XIII. The acts of the process, comprising 500 pages, distinguish two Johns of Nepomuk and sanction the cult of the one who was drowned in 1383 as a martyr of the sacrament of penance. <br />
According to some Protestant sources the figure of St. John Nepomuk is a legend due to Jesuits and its historical kernel is really Jan Hus, who was metamorphosed from a Bohemian Reformer into a Roman Catholic saint: the Nepomuk story would be based on Wenceslaus Hajek's blending of the Jan who was drowned in 1393 and the Jan who was burned in 1415. The resemblances are certainly striking, extending to the manner of celebrating their commemorations. But when the Jesuits came to Prague, the Nepomuk veneration had long been widespread, and the idea of canonization originated in opposition not to the Hussites, but to Protestantism, as a weapon of the Counter-Reformation. <b>In the image of the saint which gradually arose, the religious history of Bohemia is reflected.</b></p></blockquote><b>It's also why Alex declares Prince Bernhard the mastermind behind Bilderberg when it was really Jesuit hopeful and Knight of Malta Joseph Retinger</b>, not to be confused with the Nazi/Illuminati/Jesuit Pope Joesph Ratzinger. Retinger would have been a Jesuit and would have rose to become Black Pope, instead of his just Grey Pope nickname, but could not remain a celibate lifestyle. Daniel Estulin, the "Bilderberg expert" has said as much, in his words he called Bernhard a facade and posterboy, that Retinger was the man with all the power. But Alex acted like with me he couldn't find the time to include this. Yet he came out with a 1.5 version of Endgame and the information is still not included. But why even accredit the creation to anyone at all if you are just going to say, it was a complete and total phony? <br />
<font color="#cc0000">I like how Alex had Estulin on after I called into his show, and all they talked about was this cooked up story Estulin was claiming, that he has information from anonymous intelligence sources saying Ron Paul is a target of assassination. Alex didn't have to talk about anything I brought up with him about Retinger.</font> <br />
Another fallacy about Alex Jones is that he predicted "9/11". Wrong. William Cooper did one month before Alex. Alex can say he never heard it and say it as many times as he wants to. William Cooper is still documented as having done so one month before he did and this was at a time when Cooper's show was number 1. <br />
Cooper also called him a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ82zk8ycfs">bold faced coward liar</a>, so I tend to believe he is lying he never heard William Coopers "9/11" prediction. This was just 30 days before Coopers death. <br />
<b>Alex is a turd that needs to be flushed because he is performing as the biggest Gatekeeper of them all</b>. [...] <br />
Me saying Alex Jones is a shill is not paranoia, it is an observation supported by many facts. <b>I can say just as easily that what you call paranoia on my part is negligence on your own part</b>. Negligence for not looking into the bullshit Alex is spoon feeding you. <br />
<br />
<i>You may not agree with everything these men say but you need to stop seeing enemies where non exist and these people are your friends. I may add, our only friends ...</i> <br />
That is your opinion that Alex is not an enemy. He has you chasing your own tail and you are too stubborn to look at the evidence and admit it. Just because he occasionally tells you what you want to hear does not make him our greatest ally. You can count Alex as being among your friends if you want to but I know better. If worse comes to worse and you are stuck in a foxhole with ol Alex, all I can say is don't turn your back on him for a second. [...] <br />
I didnt say he is fake, I said the subject matter they were talking about was fabricated bullshit. BIG difference. He may have had this information planted to him and he fell for it. I never said he cooked up the story himself. I just found it very convenient for Alex that he has him on the show and Bilderberg is not discussed at all. Which means Alex did not have to discuss Joseph Retinger, because Estulin could have been asked and he either would have had to support what I confronted Alex about on his show, or he would have to say he was mistaken because he is on the record as having stated Prince Bernhard is a facade and Retinger was the real deal. <br />
<blockquote><p>Geoff Matthews) Who was the most prominent individual involved with the founding of the Bilderbergers? <br />
Daniel Estulin) Without a doubt, Joseph Retinger, a 33rd degree mason. <br />
GM) Oh really!? I thought that it was Prince Bernhard of Holland who actually founded the secret Club. <br />
DE) Bernhard was a poster boy. A pretty face and a facade.</p></blockquote>Just because your paranoid does not mean they are ALL out to get you. Just because you think you are right does not make you right by default. Until you have more to offer on the subject than just your opinions, then perhaps you should just stick with what you are good at and just looking pretty and giving an occasional opinion on subjects that dont amount to much. <br />
<i>Thank you for the compliment ...</i> <br />
So even though you may think I am unjustly paranoid, at least I bring some actual research and documented facts to the table and not just opinions based on ignorance. <br />
<i>To me ignorance is jumping to conclusions without any evidence to back up outlandish claims. So far, you have failed to provide any in regards to Alex Jones.</i> <br />
To me ignorance is simply lack of knowledge or understanding about a particular subject. I am saying you are ignorant of the issues I bring up about Alex and fail to understand their signification and relation. Dont you think not mentioning the Patron Saint of the Grove in 2 documentaries and 7 years worth of archiving is a pretty big thing to miss about the Grove? <br />
<br />
<i>Why are you sticking up for the Bohemian Grove so much anyway?</i> <br />
Not sticking up for the Grove. I am painting a more complete picture. <b>The picture Alex paints is wrong and leads truth seekers down a false Satanic impression. They are not worshiping that owl as Moloch and to jump to that conclusion is premature and irresponsible.</b> On top of everything I have in my <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/EricIndiana#g/u">Minerva vs Moloch</a> video ... the 3rd degree of the Illuminati is Minerval or Brother of Minerva. That owl represents Minerva/Athena/Inanna/Isthar or whatever the hell you want to call her and she adorns Alex's capitol building and he calls her Diana, even though she carries a sword and Diana carries a bow and has no dealings with mans public affairs whatsoever, he still insists that is Diana the Goddess of the Hunt. [...] <br />
[...] The fact that Catholicism got its roots from paganism is strange in and of itself. [...] We are not talking about mainstream Christianity. There is nothing mainstream about the power elites that attend the Bohemian Grove. And the Templars were burned, so their money could be confiscated and split between a King and the Vatican. [...] The pagan aspects about Christianity are as far removed from mainstream as you can possibly get and for good reason. No mainstream Catholic or Christian would understand these designed rituals, ceremonies and theatrical plays. [...] <br />
<font color="#cc0000">If Alex is sincere, then he is still nitpicking on what he chooses to discuss and if the <a href="http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/PERPA">perpa</a>-traitors are Jesuits and Knights of Malta and their ilk, then Alex is inadvertently covering for them. Even though I tend to think it is a deliberate act on his part. Whatever it is he is involved in, I think he believes he is on the right team. Which is what most godly men do believe.</font> <br />
<br />
<b>"Typical Alex Jones! All he can talk about is the nameless, faceless 'elite'.</b> To his credit he names the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds but he wouldn't DARE name who they work for! Neither would Lindsey Williams. Both are either Vatican shills, or devout cowards, or both!" EricIndiana <br />
<br />
<a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=62961422&blogID=461850339">"Probably because</a> <b>Alex Jones is a CIA agent, who was chosen by the CIA to become the new misleader of the truth movement. So</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_William_Cooper">William Cooper</a> <b>had to be assassinated and forgotten, so Alex Jones could become the glorious champion of truth and justice that people think he is. In reality he mixes truth with lies and covers up important details. His job is to prepare us for what's to come."</b> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.jessewoodrow.com/jessewoodrow.com/Podcasts/Archive.html">Jesse Woodrow)</a> <br />
"I found a blatant lie in 9/11 The Road To Tyranny when I wasn't even really looking for it. Alex says, don't believe me, read it for yourself. So I read the document and it says nothing what he says. Why does Alex say don't believe me, do your own research? He is mocking/imitating Bill Coopers statement. <b>If you really look into it, Alex Jones was set up as a mimic of Bill Cooper but with the twist of fear mongering the people and getting them to rise up against the government.</b> <br />
I emailed one of the bobsy uk twins and told him about the descrepency. I sent an email to the Alex Jones email address on his website. Silence. I heard nothing back. I told one of the bobsy twins I wanted to advertise on the website, I heard back the same day. So, that only confirms what you are saying. I tried to find out why he said what he did when the document didn't say that. They blew me off. Now they must be held liable. Have you ever seen what happens to people who act on Alex Jones information? Watch half way through that mockumentary when Alex Jones is so proud of his listener being attacked by a police dog. Why did Alex sound so happy about it happening?" <br />
<br />
Kenny Benwau) <br />
There is much to chew on here. <font color="#cc0000">I'm going to isolate and save this particular thread and use your keywords to help myself get a clearer picture, although you have laid out the groundwork quite nicely as to make my task much easier.</font> However, you are right, without a doubt, about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lewis_Brown">Ed and Elaine Brown.</a> <b>Alex support for Ed Brown ended at the point where Ed starting spouting off about the Jesuits.</b> Coincidence? I doubt it. You nailed that one for sure. While in prison, Ed would often talk about the Jesuits during his phone privileges. Even the people who were trying to secure his release were somewhat taken back by Ed's Jesuit comments. <b>He talked so much about the Jesuits by phone to anybody who would listen that he finally lost his phone privileges for a year.</b> Of course the authorities concocted some lame excuse saying that Ed had heard a tape recording via phone of Elaine's voice which was a violation of prison rules, but we now know what that real reason was. Ed would talk about the layout of his cell, and other rooms, and the entire compound as triangular in shape each with sets of cameras as in the "all seeing eye". <b>He said the Jesuits "control everything". He said he "underestimated the cruelty of these people" and stated the "Jesuits will overthrow the country".</b> I guess that was enough for someone to put a lid on him. Haven't heard anything since. <font color="#cc0000">He has since been shifted around from place to place and I have no clue where he is now. One of the last things he said before losing his phone privileges was that if anything should happen to him or Elaine, it will be because of the "Jesuits". He emphasized that several times.</font> I think Elaine is still somewhere at a Greenwich CT facility and doing OK but am not even sure of that. <br />
<b>As for the other extra goodies you provided, I'm sure there will be a plethora of revelations to come from all this. I feel like a kid in a candy store.</b> I sure hope you are who you say you are ... lol. Thanks OG for all your insight. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=69347281">John McGuire)</a> <br />
You could be on to something here. Other people in the same line of work (alternative media) have suffered untimely deaths or illnesses. Most are continually dealing with their servers being crashed and/or corrupted, and are continually being harrassed, attacked or issued death threats. <br />
<b>Yet, Alex Jones seems off-limits to all of the usual stuff that his comtemporaries continually endure. With his megaphone and cameras and mikes, screaming at all of the very powerful N.W.O. figures – in some instances, directly confronting them – one wonders how he could go on so long completely unscathed.</b> <font color="#cc0000">Sure, there is the occasional arrest at a big public rally (which often seems to paint the protesting group, as a whole, to look like angry nutjobs), as AJ defiantly marches off with Police – not being beaten half to death, as commonly occurs at other such rallies he fails to attend ... And, of course, after it's all over, he is released – again, not beaten up – and that's the end of the matter. Only a fool would observe this continual pattern and not question it ... Things are way too polished and smooth in AJ's world, for the type of work he does.</font> <br />
<b>Greg Szymanski has directly identified Alex Jones as a CIA asset. I will not deny that there is a lot of good intel that comes through Alex Jones's sites and this blog, but there is A PILE of stuff THAT IS OMITTED, also. Also, it is a well-known fact that the "9-11 Truth Movement" has been infiltrated by a host of government "agent provocateurs", in order to sabotage any real constructive work the group might acomplish (as well as keep tabs on them). There are many people who think AJ is just such:</b> http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=4893 ... <br />
Also, what often stands out to me here is WHAT ISN'T PRESENTED. There is a lot of relevant information and current news which does not even get mentioned here, or on either of his sites ... with the intel connections he obviously has, one has to wonder, 'why no mention?' ... <font color="#cc0000">Rather than blindly following someone we don't even know personally – whose prime motivation, at least on the surface, seems to be generating revenue – perhaps we should all do some research, and apply some reasoning.</font> <br />
Is his purpose to inform, or is it to trainwreck any attempts to challenge the status quo? Are we being diverted away from what is happening on another front – while we focus on "global warming" bull, or listen to another scholar's "9/11 opinions" that never change anything? Do we get enough inside intel here to lend credibility – even on a subconscious level – WHILE WE DO NOTHING, since someone is apparently speaking up on our behalf? <br />
... Is the purpose of this blog to inform us, or keep tabs on us? <br />
I am not intimidated by any of these scenarios, and continue to contribute here – despite what appears obvious to me. The only real hope any of us have at this point seems to be the "life beyond" – if you know the agenda of the Illuminati/NWO, we will all be exterminated or slaves within a few years, anyway ... We are clearly living in the very "end times", as described by The Bible, in Revelation (and elsewhere). <br />
I suggest to anyone reading this that you DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH ... KEEP AN OPEN MIND ... AND USE SOME INTELLIGENCE. Also, I would even more strongly urge you to get your life right before God Almighty, as WE WILL ALL STAND BEFORE HIM ONE DAY, to give an account of how we used our time and resources while stewards, here on his creation. [...] <br />
Irregardless of the true purpose of this blog, and whomever AJ may or may not be working for, it is a good place to exchange ideas and information – and there are a number of really solid contributors, whose perspectives and information I enjoy reading and benefit from. I, personally, try to fill in some of the holes regarding serious news which isn't presented here ... I know there are others who do the same. <br />
<br />
Cojo) <br />
What EricIndiana calls "forms of ultimate truth" seems to me a matter of depth. I mean, most of the very manipulating <a href="http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/index.html">corporate mainstream</a> (the <a href="http://www.hjkrysmanski.de">german variant</a> educated <a href="http://www.concordia.ca/about/whoweare/ourhistory/loyola.php">of course</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concordia_(mythology)">Concordia</a>) gives the impression of being horrifyingly (or/and hauntingly) sketchy and helplessly tattered in comparison with the articulately deeper going but also very twisting and spinning "'9/11' Truth" Conspiracy Mainstream where the modern vicious and sophisticated Jesuit Shepherd's Fold of scientific capitalist/communist dialectics is pretty successfully looking for its newest hideout. The ultimate depth, so to say, lies beneath those two leading opinion streams as the peak of the pyramid of power ("pyro a mid" = a fire in the middle – Ignatius, the fiery – <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thus_Spoke_Zarathustra">Mithraic Mysteries</a>) is enthroned in the similar but inverted way on top of all flexecutive levels down to the political Ground Zero. <br />
The revolutionary Cyberweb not only makes all networks of hidden power and the whole architecture of secret circles within non-secret organizations transparent, it shows furthermore precisely how opinion streams are actually working (and how they rule the public in general) as well as the corporate nature of our western Christian societies with their Papal template of artificial incorporated personalities like in a mirror. <br />
Our absolute decisive issue of the more or less only decision making, ultimative and absolutist backbone of the almost allmighty Roman British imperialistic "machine" – consisting of all types of secret, half-secret and non-hidden organizations – in the form of the "pride" Jesuit professes/priest soldiers is <i>that much meta</i> and off the hook, so that only hihgly interested parties can understand its importance to some extent, because like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8lMjl3p9o">biblical "chief corner stone"</a>, Jesus Christ, symbolizes a mysterious god-person in heaven, so the brotherhood of the "Jesuses quasi praesens" in the order with the strictest loyalty requires the deepest and most difficult "'9/11' Truth"-research level. <b>The army under its Luciferian majesty, the black secretary general, does constitute</b> <a href="http://www.zuguide.com/index.php#Equilibrium">the last line of defence</a> <b>and a nearly perfect insurance for all other priests, knights, masons, mormons, mafiosi, mercenaries, bankers, corporate, military and police officers, bureaucrats, politicians, journalists, laywers and so on.</b> The information about the dominance of Jesuit worldwide influence is certainly the most profound of all cultural scouting attempts, and without connecting all ranks of real political power to a coherent unit, a verifiable copy, a meticulous model from the veiled temporal apparatus of the Papacy with its most relevant sections, we probably may not have a real chance against the maelstrom of two mainstreams initiated on September 11, 2001. <br />
<br />
<b>The Knights of Malta are</b> "<a href="http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=13465">the militia of the Pope</a>, <b>and are sworn to total obedience by a blood oath which is taken extremely seriously and to the death.</b>. The Pope as the head of the Vatican is also the head of a foreign national power. [...] Those who are presently members of the Knights of Malta must on penalty of death support those policies advocated by the Vatican. It is not hard for them to do this. They <i>believe</i> in these policies and principles. The polices which are espoused and proclaimed by Pope John Paul II. are as follows: <br />
1. End of sovereignty for the United States and other countries. <br />
2. End of absolute property rights. <br />
3. End of all gun rights. <br />
4. The new international economic order (world government). <br />
5. The redistribution of wealth and jobs. <br />
6. Calls for nations to trust the United Nations. <br />
7. Total disarmament. <br />
8. Promote the United Nations as the hope for peace. <br />
9. Promote UNESCO, the deadly educational and cultural arm of the United Nations. <br />
10. Promote interdependence. <br />
11. Support sanctions honoring Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the New Age humanist priest. <br />
12. Support the belief that the economic principle of traditional Christian or Catholic social doctrine is the economic principle of communism. <br />
13. Promote the Pope as the acting go-between for the United States and the Soviet Union. <br />
The secret society members in the high levels of political and economic power – if they are not the actual decision-makers – are OWNED by others. <b>They are compromised by the freedom of their will. They chose to believe what they believe</b>." <br />
<br />
EricIndiana calls the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxdme1ZcQPY">Skull and Bones Society</a> a "recruiting ground for the Jesuits". I'm not sure whether his conception is in accordance to mine which considers Yale's bonesmen club rather as some sort of training facility in a way where a "David Webb" became <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/thebourneultimatum/th_medium.html">Jason Bourne</a>, for example. The core of the fellowship or its main purpose is made up to get fresh aspirants on a short leash, I believe, like in the movie "Fightclub" or along the critical question to Webb/Bourne: "Will you commit to this program?"<br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-17177615910828047662009-12-13T23:55:00.009+01:002009-12-14T12:18:36.469+01:00It has begun<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
<center>It <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2LVgzcyImw">has begun</a> …</center> <br />
Here come the <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/freeman-on-land.html">Freemen</a> – non-<a href="http://ifjonknew.blogspot.com/2009/11/pope-restoring-empire-i-hope-he.html">Catholic.</a> <br />
No longer being obedient to <a href="http://worldpoliticalauthority.blogspot.com/2009/11/corporate-model-has-poisened-free.html">church/state mega mumbo-jumbo</a> with the Knights of Jesus as the <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/meet-patriots-1.html">self-declared gods</a> on earth. <br />
<br />
<b>Men of the Church like</b> <a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/charles_coughlin_served_god_an.html">Makow,</a> <b>Melanson and many other devout American Papists, the Catholic column of controlled conspiracists, can't talk about it, Maxwell can. <br />
He was one of the biggest icebreakers in bringing this ground-breaking issue to public attention.</b> <br />
<br />
<i>There is</i> a distinct front line that can be marked, and then everybody can decide for himself to live free or stay mind controlled and "shepherded" by the <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/good-jesuit-bad-jesuit-commentaries-1.html?showComment=1256213562845#c7007357898070206644">most brainwashed</a> and thus <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXpMVOofP-A&fmt=18">most ruthless</a> people on the planet. <blockquote><p>Even in Loyola's own mind the idea did not take immediate and final shape. For years he gave himself up to a personal training which should fit him for the end he had in view: prayer and fasting, study and travel, the subjugation of the flesh, the education of the brain, the purification of the spirit, to these he devoted himself.</p></blockquote>Mr. Loyalty <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/investigative-journal-commentaries-1.html">in 1553:</a> <b>"I beseech you by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ: bestir you to subjugate and subdue the most highbred and difficult part of your mind, reason and judgement."</b> <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2766">"The Federal Reserve</a> is more secretive than the CIA." <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPABeUU-VqU">Alan Grayson</a> <br />
12/07'09 EJP) Dollar Bubble: Black Pope's Fed to destroy the once Protestant Dollar</center> <br />
This video accurately describes the coming hyperinflation, the ruination of the once gold and silver-backed Protestant Dollar, having been replaced with the Black Pope's Federal Reserve Note since 1965. All the Protestant personages on the American currencies will be "gone with the wind". Those persons include Washington, Lincoln, Hamilton, Jackson, Grant, and McKinley. <b>The entity responsible is the Federal Reserve Bank – patterned after the Papacy – with its three huge windows at the entrance, symbolizing the Vatican's pagan trinity of Osiris-Horus-Isis!</b> <br />
In William Greider's <a href="http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2006/06/dirty-secrets-of-temple.html">Secrets of the Temple:</a> <i>How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country</i> Roman Catholic <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25740405">Richard Syron,</a> former vice president of the Boston Fed and special assistant to Fed chairman/CFR-member <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Volcker">Paul Volcker,</a> clearly stated on page 54: <blockquote><p>The System is just like the Church. That's probably why I feel so comfortable with it. It's got a pope, the chairman, and a college of cardinals, the governors. And bank presidents. And a curia, the senior staff. The equivalent of the laity is the commercial banks. If you're a naughty parishioner in the Catholic Church, you come to confession. In this system, if you're naughty, you come to the Discount window for a loan. We even have different orders of religious thought like Jesuits and Franciscans and Dominicans only we call them pragmatists and monetarists and neo-Keynesians.</p></blockquote><font color="#cc0000">The deliberately destroyed "Dollar" will be replaced with Rome's "Amero", linking Roman Catholic Mexico, apostate Protestant Canada/Roman Catholic Quebec and apostate Protestant/Roman Catholic America into the North American Union. After the crash will come the religious ("Christian" vs Muslim) and racial (white vs black) "Civil War II", justifying martial law, the subsequent opening of the concentration camps, and the fascist-cherished moving of the capital to Denver, Colorado, as planned since 1940. The end will be America's Sino-Soviet-Moslem invasion facilitated by Red China's huge navy built with scrap U.S. steel, including steel from the CIA/NSA/FBI-demolished World Trade Center and the "Cash for Clunkers" swindle.</font> <br />
The solution is first spiritual – repentance and belief of the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, and then temporal – State secession. Once a State secedes, it can then assert its own national sovereignty once again. The new nation-state can then begin to resolve the problems created by Rome and her multitude of secret societies through Washington, D.C. The video is well done with key personages being interviewed – yet, as usual, no mention is made of Rome and its henchman, the Society of Jesus. <br />
<br />
<b>I'm pretty sure I can predict already that this implied front line will finally be found between the much-loved Mafia mentality, practically belonging to the thoroughly mendacious Catholic official belief, and an anti-blind-obedience movement, led by true Freemen (on the land)</b> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtTLfvpjN-E&fmt=18">leading off the fight</a> <b>against the Roman British corporate legal fiction system that enslaves everybody into a mobbed-up society.</b> <br />
<br />
And if the Romish one-billion people of church believers actually want their Papal sun god pharaoh to rule the world on behalf of a <a href="http://www.amazon.de/Civilization-Love-Every-Catholic-Transform/dp/0061335312">"civilization of love",</a> of course, and by <a href="http://worldpoliticalauthority.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-world-order-encyclical-1.html">"charity in truth"</a> ("Truth opens and unites our minds in the lógos of love – this is the Christian proclamation and testimony of charity."), then we'll probably get the Black Pope's sort of <a href="http://www.zuguide.com/index.php#Equilibrium">Equilibrium,</a> guaranteed for eternity through chip implants with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnkYo9TuBIQ">Litvinenko</a> option. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2916">12/12'09</a> Archbishop of Canterbury meets with Black Pope Adolfo Nicolás</center> <br />
The Archbishop Of Canterbury is Rowan Williams. Williams is also a high-level, English Freemason, though he claims otherwise. Thus we see the Pope of Rome using one of his occult Freemasons leading the Anglican Church of England back to the "Unholy Father" of Rome. <b>Again, Jesuit-authored and directed, Illuminized Freemasonry is THE GREAT TOOL of Satan's Black Pope to unite the apostate, Reformation Bible-rejecting, Protestant churches of Western Civilization under the headship of "His Unholiness" – Pope Benedict XVI. Once the churches are re-united with Rome, the governments of those once White Protestant nations will be absolutely ruled by the Pope, pure and simple.</b> As go the Protestant and Baptist churches, so go the once Protestant governments born out of the Reformation. The abominable, ecumenical "Manhattan Declaration" – uniting Roman Catholics with Protestants and Evangelicals – is paving the way for the Jesuit-directed, Council for National Policy-backed, "New Right" Roman Fascism. Apostate Protestant and Baptist churches – without question – breed tyrannical governments as in America today. That totalitarian, Jesuit-led, Papal rule reverting the world back to Rome's Dark Ages is to be realized through the North American Union and the European Union. Recently, Archbishop Williams had lunch with Jesuit General Nicolás after meeting with Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican. We wonder what topics must have been discussed … <br />
<br />
He said one of the issues was Phase III of the formal dialogue between the two churches. <br />
<a href="http://www.livingchurch.org/news/news-updates/2009/12/4/rowan-in-rome">That dialogue began in 1967</a> with the establishment of ARCIC. The first phase ended in 1981, while Phase II lasted from 1983 to 2004. The archbishop said that <i>"informal talks"</i> between Anglican and Roman Catholic representatives would <i>"set the agenda"</i> for the commission's long-term work. [...] On Nov. 20, Cardinal Kasper and Archbishop Williams jointly led an Evening Prayer service at the Oratory of Saint Francis Xavier del Caravita, not far from the Anglican Centre and the Gregorian University, in the heart of Rome.<br />
<br />
<center>EVERYTHING <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/cveitch#grid/user/1C5F0FF4E4F424EC">IS OK</a> <br />
This level of control <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7izL27KHcw&fmt=18">is hidden.</a></center> <br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-18893735002668007832009-12-06T23:58:00.004+01:002009-12-18T07:49:43.751+01:00VaticanAssassins.org entries 2009<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
EJP <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/eric-jon-phelps-lopo.html">lopo</a> <br />
<br />
VaticanAssassins.org <b>news</b> <a href="http://jesuitorder.blogspot.com/2009/12/vaticanassassinsorg-news-entries-2.html">entries 2</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2513">12/01'09</a> Brother Chris exposes Mayan Calendar 2012 deception <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1445">11/06'09</a> Arab American Sunni Moslem murders 14, wounds 30 at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Hood_shooting">Fort Hood</a> <br />
<br />
VaticanAssassins.org <b>news</b> <a href="http://jesuitorder.blogspot.com/2009/12/vaticanassassinsorg-news-entries-1.html">entries 1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1332">11/04'09</a> Knights of Malta and J.P. Morgan financial colossus <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1351">11/04'09</a> Russell Blaylock: Countering forced vaccinations <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1170">10/29'09</a> Former <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rauni-Leena_Luukanen-Kilde">Finnish Minister</a> of Health speaks out on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTgyakGAddM&fmt=18">Swine Flu scandal</a> and about "The Elite" <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1144">10/28'09</a> Calvin, history's premier destroyer of <font color="#cc0000">Jesuit communism</font> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1129">10/28'09</a> Canadian comments on Anglican Reunion with Rome <br />
<br />
VaticanAssassins.org <b>mail</b> <a href="http://ericcorresponds.blogspot.com/2009/12/vaticanassassinsorg-mail-entries-3.html">entries 3</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2620">12/02'09</a> EJP explains use of the term "Nigga" on LRL and in private <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2606">12/02'09</a> EJP corrected by Romanist: <font color="#cc0000">"perfidious" Jews eliminiated in 1960</font> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=2588">12/02'09</a> EJP replies to Brother Michael, an honorably retired Portland police officer <br />
<br />
VaticanAssassins.org <b>mail</b> <a href="http://ericcorresponds.blogspot.com/2009/10/vaticanassassinsorg-mail-entries-2.html">entries 2</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=945">10/20'09</a> The Count on Jesuitism and Occult Freemasonry <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1003">10/21'09</a> EJP answers Italian count on State Senator Larry Farnese of Pennsylvania <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=979">10/21'09</a> EJP replies to Lebanese Christian attorney <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1587">11/09'09</a> Hannes from Austria on Jesuit programming <br />
<br />
VaticanAssassins.org <b>mail</b> <a href="http://ericcorresponds.blogspot.com/2009/10/vatican-assassins-blog-entries-filed.html">entries 1</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=484">10/06'09</a> Muslim scholar and EJP <br />
<a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=959">10/20'09</a> EJP replies to questions of Muslim scholar<br />
<br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-75974262578911795882009-11-24T00:00:00.017+01:002009-12-07T01:23:19.922+01:00Investigative Journal comments 2<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1273&cpage=1#comment-201">12/06'09</a></center> <br />
"I think this is <a href="http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/George.Washington.Quote.B726">a typically crafty thing</a> for a Mason to say. I think that if you look at the occult symbols of the Masonic aprons of Washington, they speak for themselves. It is said that Washington and Weishaupt were doubles. <b>Masonry had been occult from the time that the Knights Templar landed in Scotland. The American and French Revolutions were naught but the English and French Masons working together with their 'worshipful brothers' in the colonies to gain parity with the Monarchy in England and destroy it entirely in favor of mercantilism in France. I think that both the US and Israel are artificial Masonic constructs.</b> Just look at the Supreme Court building of the State of Israel. That's what I think." <br />
<a href="http://doreendotansarchive.blogspot.com/2009/12/i-was-right-about-nazi-infiltration.html">Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan,</a> Tzfat, Israel <br />
<br />
Canada's current Chief Justice is Beverly McLachlan. <a href="http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=44731674&postcount=2">Here she is</a> wearing the traditional robes of the office. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1191&cpage=1#comment-192">11/19'09</a> <b>Catholics like Joseph don't care about freedom at all</b></center> <br />
One of the most devout among the devout ones, Joe Fromm, went through the <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22Ignatian+exercises%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">Ignatian Exercises</a> and now he's convinced that freedom would be something that Judas stands with his life for ... <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/good-jesuit-bad-jesuit-commentaries-1.html?showComment=1256213562845#c7007357898070206644">as "antithesis",</a> of course, <i>antithesis.</i> In other words, thoughts about living free, which means living without the murderous as well as soapy and slimy (spiritual and political) wardship of the priestly "fathers" including all of their wannabe followers, are considered by him as <i>anti.</i> <font color="#cc0000">When "free" equals "anti", "devout" behaviour appears to be "normal". Matching the norm is what Loyal Joe wishes for the most as the best way of life he seems to be able of thinking of. This particular characteristic makes him in my eyes to a shining prototype of what conspiracy theorists call "sheeple" (in doing so almost all of them sadly not seeing the glaring sheep-shepherd connection and therefore unfortunately not being aware of this second false flag public-opinion mainstream, intentionally and very skillfully misdirected by leading "9/11" truth protagonists like Jones/Tarpley/Griffin). From a piety-theoretical viewpoint there is nothing that will ever unsettle this kind of faith in his god represented by the Roman brotherhoods, because in such a thoroughgoing, total collectivist mind set where freedom is equivalent to treason, Mr. Fromm just loves being incorporated by "God" in form of a dogmatic society of Jesus-like conformists.</font> And incorporated according to his theory mostly for a happy afterlife! What does it matter that his real life proceeds in its social dimension as a (legal) fiction? Nothing! <b>Not. A. Bit.</b> That's where the frontline goes, I believe. Exactly at <i>this</i> point. <br />
Therefore the main methods and principles of how the Roman brotherhoods under the Catholic fold (in its <a href="http://ifjonknew.blogspot.com/2009/11/pope-restoring-empire-i-hope-he.html">3 meanings</a>) succeed in generating devoutness with a romantic semblance across the board have to be found and formulated. And this specific knowledge about the corresponding manufactures of "holy" celebrities within and outside of the Church, "icons for the masses to illumining them", cultural saints or simply gods of culture, so to speak, could become a key for a deeper understanding of the ongoing process of mental enslavement, called Inculturation by the Jesuits, of which "9/11" is a considerable part. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.letsmakemoney.at/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=c552919baf837a2430bb03b47401f9d5">"Hallo,</a> das ist ganz schön starker Tobak, wie man so sagt. Wem soll ich jetzt glauben? Dir oder den Zeugnissen (in Wort und Leben) von Maximilian Kolbe, Theresa von Kalkutta, Bernadette Soubirous, Giovanni Bosco bis zu Simon Petrus und Paulus von Tarsus? <br />
Hey hey, <a href="http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/members/shairfield2.htm">this is,</a> as the saying goes, pretty strong stuff. Whom shall I believe now? You or the testimonies (in words and deeds) of Maximilian <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximilian_Kolbe">Kolbe,</a> Mother <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Teresa">Teresa,</a> Bernadette <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernadette_Soubirous">Soubirous,</a> John <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Bosco">Bosco</a> right up to Simon Peter and Paul of Tarsus?" <br />
You see? Canonized individuals can counterbalance whole crusades, wars, genocides, conquests, simply every single cardinal crime. Like Jesus himself. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1273&cpage=1#comment-193">11/19'09</a></center> <br />
If a political instrument like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Brookhiser">Brookhiser</a> points out, "what George Washington made <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/180130/august-28-2008/richard-brookhiser">a good president</a> was that he was able to pick people and then he was willing to trust them," what could it mean? <br />
<br />
Excellent comment, Geus. Very powerful. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1273&cpage=1#comment-189">11/16'09</a></center> <br />
<a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-december-14-2006/moment-of-zen---stable-iran">Bush,</a> the idiot. <br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3_GW0ZoRhc&fmt=18">Hitler,</a> the idot. <br />
But the generals, the <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22military+men+are+just+dumb+stupid+animals+to+be+used+as+pawns%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">"dumb stupid"</a> military men, now and then go and went along with the orders given them by the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-27692-LA-County-Libertarian-Examiner~y2009m11d7-Truth-be-told-Henry-Kissinger-is-not-an-advisor-to-Pope-Benedict-XVI">Cardinal</a> criminals. And that <b>always</b> with a deadpan expression. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1273&cpage=1#comment-188">11/16'09</a></center> <br />
<a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-july-10-2001/moment-of-zen---right-hand-up-please">Right hand up,</a> please! <br />
From the guy that brought you your new <a href="http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/04/20070430-3.html">Día del Ejército.</a> <br />
"Loyalty" in the sense of "Loyola". <a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/%252522Roman%20salute%252522/tlthe5th/nazi-vatican/hizbollahsalute.jpg">Hail!</a> <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1273&cpage=1#comment-187">11/16'09</a></center> <br />
A false flag constitution is nothing but a chimera, <a href="http://biblicalstudies.ozwide.net.au/scriptures_and_dinosaurs.html">a phantom.</a> <br />
"The <i>well-ordered</i> Republic: For <b>the Church amongst you, unopposed by the Constitution</b> and the government of your nation, fettered by no hostile legislation, protected against violence by the common laws and the impartiality of the tribunals, <b>is free to live and act without hindrance."</b> <br />
Just listen when <a href="http://worldpoliticalauthority.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-world-order-encyclical-1.html">the bishops speak!</a> But listen very, <i>very</i> carefully! <br />
"I am so thrilled to know that George Washington died a Catholic. He was our <a href="http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/catholic/T6G9D7LBHFG9JAAN8/post4">best president."</a> <br />
"Washington was by far our best president, Mary. After his terms it was all downhill." <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1262&cpage=1#comment-185">11/15'09</a></center> <br />
<a href="http://www.egyptcx.netfirms.com/bible_uranograph_cosmic_illumination_10.htm">Craig M. Lyons)</a> It is like a 10,000 piece theological puzzle to which 400 parts are missing, thus giving a false picture of what was intended by the "maker", God. <font color="#cc0000">There is only one truth about mankind's Soul and it lies in the dark Skies overhead enlightening the way for the whole of mankind. And we never knew that the path for mankind Spiritual enlightenment and Spiritual development lays over our heads at night. The uranograph has laid silent since the persecutions started with the emergence of Orthodox Roman Christianity in the early 3rd century.</font> But, by no means, think that such persecutions of the Gnostic Christians started this late, because actually it began with Ignatius, Justin Martyr, and Irenaeus in the late Second Century and only gained momentum from there in destroying this "One Faith" intended for the whole of mankind, this Science of the Soul. This "One Faith" and "One Way" for all mankind does not separate mankind and breed hatred and suspicion between mankind, nor is it the cause of wars and untold bloodshed seen in the likes of the Christian inquisition, crusades, progroms, etc. Don't get me wrong, Christianity is not the only world religion to be guilty of such atrocities committed in the name of religion, but their persecution of Judaism, which just happens to teach this Ancient Spiritual Wisdom which they inherited by their biological parents in Ancient Egypt, is <a href="http://paganizingfaithofyeshua.netfirms.com/persecution_jews_by_christians.htm">a crime of all crimes</a> against mankind and is responsible for the Dark Ages and repression of mankind's development on this planet even today. <b>Two thousand years down the road we, as children growing up in this Western Christian hemisphere, have not one clue about the truth behind our inherited "Jesus Story" or how to accurately interpret out Bibles.</b> <font color="#cc0000">Not one clue that the truth is not about some supposed man who was personified and "carnalized" and "literalized" some two thousand years ago by an emerging Gentile anti-Jewish establishment who did not want to live according to "ma'at" and the Laws of God as did Egypt and Egypt's children, the Jewish nation.</font> This terrible Roman "reinterpretation" of Sacred Religious Knowledge of the Soul in the Egyptian religion has robbed mankind today of its righful heritage and plunged the world into the Dark Ages to which mankind has been deliberately trying to emerge in the last two hundred years. The hope for mankind is on the horizon as such knowledge is again seeing the light of day and at the same time exposing the Roman lies and their "way of salvation" which they forced upon the world at the point of a sword for over 1,800 years. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1262&cpage=1#comment-183">11/15'09</a></center> <br />
"Caritas in Veritate" or: "All We Need is the <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22all+we+need+is+the+right+major+crisis%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">Right Major Crisis"</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html">07/07'09</a> The Romish Pharaoh says: To the bishops, priests and deacons, men and women religious, the lay faithful and all people of good will on integral human development in charity and truth <br />
<br />
1. Charity in truth, to which Jesus Christ bore witness by his earthly life and especially by his death and resurrection, is the principal driving force behind the authentic development of every person and of all humanity. Love – caritas – is an extraordinary force which leads people to opt for courageous and generous engagement in the field of justice and peace. It is a force that has its origin in God, Eternal Love and Absolute Truth. <b>Each person finds his good by adherence to God's plan for him, in order to realize it fully: in this plan, he finds his truth, and through adherence to this truth he becomes free</b> (cf. Jn 8:32). To defend the truth, to articulate it with humility and conviction, and to bear witness to it in life are therefore exacting and indispensable forms of charity. Charity, in fact, "rejoices in the truth" (1 Cor 13:6). <b>All people feel the interior impulse to love authentically: love and truth never abandon them completely, because these are the vocation planted by God in the heart and mind of every human person. The search for love and truth is purified and liberated by Jesus Christ from the impoverishment that our humanity brings to it, and he reveals to us in all its fullness the initiative of love and the plan for true life that God has prepared for us. In Christ, charity in truth becomes the Face of his Person,</b> and so on and so forth. See <a href="http://worldpoliticalauthority.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-world-order-encyclical-1.html">Part 1</a> of the Popish N.W.O. Encyclical. <br />
<br />
A true masterpiece of clerical demagogy! <br />
But it really doesn't get fatter anymore: <b>love</b> ('mostly from a god's death, which mysteriously didn't last besides a couple of hours'), <b>truth</b> – it's <i>all the way in.</i> I'd like to suggest that there is no further progression possible. <br />
<blockquote><p><i>For all this, there is urgent need of a true</i> <a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%22world+political+authority%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">world political authority,</a> as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago. <b>Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the principles of</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity">subsidiarity</a> & <a href="http://www.mellenpress.com/mellenpress.cfm?bookid=5088&pc=9">solidarity.</a></p></blockquote>Step by step into the New World Order under the <a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1162">bloody</a> Jesuit Shepherd's Fold …<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=707&cpage=1#comment-70">03/30'09</a></center> <br />
Speaking of good writing. <br />
1848, from the editor's preface of Abbate Leone's <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/11999645/The-Jesuit-Conspiracy-The-Secret-Plan-of-the-Order">The Jesuit Conspiracy.</a> The Secret Plan <br />
Victor Considérant, London, January 27, 1845) <br />
"I must confess that at that time I did not believe much in the Jesuits, and therefore I was disposed to attach but little importance to the publication of the Conference. It had always struck me that the public did the Jesuits too much honour in giving themselves so much concern about them. I believed indeed that the order was deeply committed to very retrograde ideas, but I did not give it credit for the activity, profundity, or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_F_tD7C3zc">Machiavellian ubiquity</a> generally imputed to it. <b>In a word, to use a phrase that accurately expresses what I then thought, I calculated that at least a discount of from sixty to eighty per cent should be struck off from the current estimate respecting the Jesuits.</b> <br />
<font color="#cc0000">As for their obscurantist and retrograde conspiracy, I thought it of no more account against the development of human progress and liberty, than the barriers of sand raised by children against the tides of the ocean. And even now, though enlightened as to the character and intrinsic power of the celebrated Company, I still persist in that opinion. For, however strong the arms that raise it, the anti-democratic barrier is still but a rampart of shifting sand, incapable of stopping the rising tide: at most it can but trouble the clearness of the foremost waves</font>. [...] <br />
But the guarantees afforded by the character of the witness are not the only motives that have convinced me of the authenticity of his testimony. <b>Thousands of proofs, incidents of conversation, questions put at long intervals on delicate points, and imperceptible circumstances of the drama, have always resulted in an agreement so exact, positive, and formal, that truth alone could produce such perfect coaptation</b>. [...] <br />
The utmost skill in lying could not produce a tissue always perfectly smooth in its most delicate interruptions. Imagination may, no doubt, very ingeniously arrange the plot and details of a fiction. But if at long intervals, in the thousand turns of conversation, and without letting the author perceive your drift, you make him talk at random of all the details which the story suggests, then certainly if the web is spurious you will discover many a broken thread. Now, <a href="http://www.ricksiegel.com/web2/node/114">this web</a> of Leone's I have examined with a microscope for months together in every part, and I have not been able to detect in it one broker thread or one knot. <b>I have no doubt, therefore, if the authenticity of the narrative become the subject of serious discussion, that narrator will rise victorious over every difficulty that can be raised up against him</b>. For I do not think that he can encounter any stronger or more numerous that I myself and some of my friends have directly or indirectly set before him. [...] <br />
<br />
It seems evident to me that these speeches cannot be the produce of a literary artist's imagination: the imitation of nature is not to be carried to such a pitch. Certainly, it is not a young man, a young Piedmontese priest, though endowed with talent, sensibility, imagination, and good sense, who could have produced such a work. To this day, though his intellect is much more mature and his aquirements considerably enlarged, I do not hesitate to declare Leone quite incapable of composing such a piece. I go further and assert, that there is not one among all the living writers of Europe who could have been capable of doing so. There is in those speeches a mixture of strength, weakness, brilliancy, a variety of styles and views, a composite of puerilities, grandeur, ridiculous hopes, and audacious conceptions, such as no art could create. <br />
Yes, they are surely priests who speak those speeches – <b>not good and simple priests, but proud priests, versed in a profound policy, nurtured in the traditions of an order that regards itself as the citadel and soul of Catholic Theocracy</b> – whose gigantic ambition, whose hopes and whose substance, it has gathered up and condensed. <b>An order whose constant thought is a thought of universal sway, and which ceases not to strive after the possession of influences, positions, and consciences, by the audacious employment of every means</b>. Yes, those who speak thus are indeed <font color="#cc0000">men detached from every social tie – emancipated from every obligation of ordinary morality – reckoning as nothing whatever is not the Order, in which they are blended like metals in the melting pot, the corporation, in which they are absorbed as rivers in the sea, the supreme end, to which they remorselessly sacrifice everything – having begun by sacrificing to it each his life, his soul, his free-will, his whole personality. Yes, those are truly the leaders of a mysterious formidable initiation – patient as the drop of water that wears down the rock – prosecuting in darkness its works of centuries over the whole globe – despising men, and founding its strength upon their weakness – covering its political encroachments under the veil of humility and the interests of Heaven – and weaving with invincible perseverance the meshes of the net with which, in the pride that is become its faith, its morals, and its religion, it dreams of enclosing Kings and Peoples, States and Churches, and all mankind.</font> <br />
<br />
Now, the Theocratic genius, founding its domination on the alleged interests of God – covering them with the impenetrable veil of the Sanctuary – marching with the <b>infinite resources aquired in a long practice of confession, in a profound study of the human heart, and in the arsenal of all the seductions of matter and mysticism</b>, taking for the auxiliaries of its inimitable design human passions, obscurity, and time – <b>the Theocratic genius</b> – if, with a deliberate consciousness of its aim, it <b>has constituted itself a hierarchical militia, detached from all ties of affection</b> – <font color="#cc0000">must necessarily carry to its maximum of concentration and energy that politic spirit before which persons and the morality of actions disappear, and which retains but one human sentiment and one moral principle – that of absolute devotedness to the animus of the corporation, to its aim and its triumph</font>. And who, then, save eight or ten of those strong heads among the higher class of the initiated – <b>those politic priests, those brains without heart, puffed up by the defeat of the modern spirit (1824), intoxicated by a recent triumph, and by the perfume of that general Restoration which had already given them back a legal and canonical existence, and the favour of the governments of Italy, France, Austria etc.</b> – who but such men, taking measure at such a moment of their forces for conquest, could have held such language? <br />
There are mad flights of pride so delirious, that no imagination could invent them. <font color="#cc0000">To set them forth with the fire, brilliancy, and energetic audacity, they display in a great number of passages in the <i>Secret Conference</i>, the Word that speaks must itself be wholly profundity – that laborious patience, proof against the toil of ages – that sense of ubiquity – that absolute devotedness to a purpose whose fulfilment is seen through the vista of many generations – that absorption of the personal and transient individual in the corporate and permanent individual – and above all, if I may so express myself, that transcendant immorality, which all stamp upon the <i>Secret Conference</i> the character of a monstrous and insane grandeur. These are surely the tokens of a paroxysm of <i>subversive unitism</i>, such as could only be manifested, the moment after a European resurrection and victory, by Policy and Theocracy allied in an Order self-constituted as the occult brain of the Church, and the predestined supreme government of the world.</font> <br />
<br />
And truly, when we reflect on the organic virtue of that <a href="http://www.ricksiegel.com/web2/node/119">theocratic power</a>, which feels itself immutable amidst the vacillations of the political world, we are constrained to own, that such is the nature of its means, such the temper of its weapons, that it might with more reason than any conqueror, or even than any people, aspire to universal dominion, if instead of seeking to cast back the nations into the past, and to plunge mankind again into the night of the Middle Ages, a thing which is purely impossible, it had undertaken the glorious tast of guiding men towards the splendours of freedom and the future. <font color="#cc0000">That Order, which for many a century has braved kings and nations – which neither the decrees of princes, nor the bulls of popes, nor the anathemas of the conscience of nations, nor the terrible wrath of revolutions, have been able to crush – whose severed fragments reunite in the shade like those of the hydra – that Order, everywhere present and impalpable, which feels itself living, with its eternal and mute thought, in the midst of all that makes a noise and passes away – that Order, on comparing itself with those governments whose vices, corruption, and caducity, would make them pliant subjects for its crafty magnetism</font> – must certainly have conceived through its chiefs the plan developed in the <i>Secret Conference</i>, and none but the initiated could have given to that plan the profound, eloquent, and impassioned forms, which that grand folly there assumes. The fumes of pride have mounted to the brain of the mysterious colossus, and he has failed to perceive that this feet are of clay, and that the inevitable flood of the modern spirit is reaching them and washing them away. <br />
Boundless ambition, a mighty organization, indomitable perseverance, and absolute devotedness, all directed to the attainment of an impossible object, an absurd chimera pursued by a transcendent system of means as immoral as they are puerile – such are, in brief, the characteristics of that modern incarnation of Theocracy which is called <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXpMVOofP-A&fmt=18">Jesuitism</a>. [...] <br />
I say for my part, instead of the veracity of the story being impugned by its improbability, that very improbability is a pledge of veracity. [...] <br />
<b>The Jesuits are the</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janissaries">Janissaries</a> <b>of theocratic Catholicism."</b> <br />
<br />
"At the London economic conference in 1933 attended by representatives of about 65 nations, all eyes and hopes were on Roosevelt. Instead of supporting pragmatic economic measures including the strengthening of the gold standard, <b>Roosevelt did the complete opposite: effectively destroying the international currency and monetary system over night</b> through the <a href="http://www.usavsus.info/USA-Traficant.html">Emergency Banking Act of 1933</a>. <blockquote><p>The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same. [...] The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a 'beneficiary' of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their 'subjects', the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.</p></blockquote>Banning gold exports. The actions of Roosevelt had the ultimate, immediate effect of drying up the last remaining liquidity capital in global markets enforcing the United States to borrow large sums of money from the private bankers owning what: the gold, the Federal Reserve ... <font color="#cc0000">getting these guys rich, the money cartell we talked about – that's all it is! It's like a drug cartell, they just do it with money. Same thing, Same principle. Economist desicions that defy logical explanation to this day!</font> <b>There is no reason for that, unless he was being controlled by the bankers themselves who're controlled by the Jesuits who founded the western banking systems, and told them exactly what to do."</b> <br />
<br />
The shill and the demon <br />
<a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/10/shill-and-demon.html">Richard Bell</a> interviewed by John Rappoport, <a href="http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2009/2009-LRN/10-2009-LRN/GSIJ.102009_070500.MP3">read aloud</a> by Greg to his broad- and podcast auditory <br />
<br />
<center>"The Roman Catholic Church will <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=O8HUVYDLV_Y">rule the world</a> again." <br />
No message is <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/10/are-you-patriot-or-coadjutor.html">more</a> important</center> <br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-22354429337089676122009-11-22T23:58:00.005+01:002009-12-18T07:51:35.882+01:00Vatican Assassins comments 1<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
EJP <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/eric-jon-phelps-lopo.html">lopo</a> <br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1238&cpage=1#comment-78">11/22'09</a></center> <br />
Every gatekeeper helps in this circus of (genuine/authentic and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag">false flag</a>/dogmatically acting) conspiracist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracist">criminalistics</a> where you have to figure out all of their tricks like in every computer game, before you can pass through them up to the next level. Every major contributor helps in this open and ongoing fight between open-minded researchers and their well-shepherded, well-protected opponents, the controlled controversialists: political instruments like "cultural gods/trendsetters", "icons/celebrities", "experts/professors", "agents", "journalists", "lawyers", "actors", "politicians", "soldiers" and so on and so forth. Could it be possible to escape from such a monstrous labyrinthian trap of modern dialectics for the purpose of preserving control over the public mind as it worked for <i>millennia?</i> How could one break through this nerve-racking and contemptuous theatre of half-truths? How to not only cut through it but make "the matrix" literally transparent without missing the point? Well, I think, it's not that much of an unsolvable problem, in fact, it's relatively easy. I mean, of course, only for those who are really open-minded, who don't try to protect a certain piety for themselves, a certain personal romantic spiritual home – only then it will work. <br />
<br />
OG said, "it is not always a matter of one person being right and the other being wrong. Often times both can be right," while my impression is that a lot of squabble about "lying" and "saying the truth" can simply be ascribed as outgrowths of impreciseness. So where is the way out? <br />
Let's take a look at Webster Tarpley. <a href="http://ericcorresponds.blogspot.com/2009/10/vatican-assassins-blog-entries-filed.html">I listed him</a> kind of in a category of high-level academics which was a big mistake. It is ridiculous to think of him as an outstanding scientist or so, I'll never do that again, because the more intense you're learing, the quicker he'll lose his reputation as an unprejudiced investigator and turns into an blatantly helpless false flag historian. Why do I <i>know</i> he is a <a href="http://catholiccolossus.blogspot.com/2009/11/wherever-knights-of-jesus-have-hand-in.html">disinformation artist</a> like his buddy Alex Jones and many others? I can see the parameters wherein they operate. <a href="http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/18570/Webster_G__Tarpley___The_Men_Behind_Obama_Pt_1_2/">Webster,</a> for instance, never goes as far as <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=UT1Op6XNnIk">Jordan.</a> Why not? Is the subject maybe not interesting enough for him or too complexe or something? Is it not worth to ask for details and to focus on the origins of our beloved ingrained Roman British <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracy">corporatocracy?</a> He seems to be immune to the whole <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/10/freeman-on-land.html">legal fiction fraud</a> that's going on for centuries. He can't either verify nor falsify such coherences. All what remains for him is to deny it or joking around. And at this point, you have found the contours of Mr. Tarpley's grid square of propaganda where you can take the next step: mapping out this labyrinth of post-"9/11" conspiracy theories and theorists, mapping out this virtually confusing battlefield of all varieties of professional psychological warfare technics. From Noam Chomsky to the-guy-who-is-not-Steve-Doocy – map them out! Define the actual pieties – that's the key! Because once you have them, once you are aware of the frontiers in the spirit of corporate as well as conspiratorial mainstream protagonists, you will come up with a new level, a new dimension of not only unanswered but yet unproposed questions, and this then will become a complete different game, a complete different fight with complete different rules. <br />
<br />
All of those methodologically predominant and scientifically sophisticated academics that Terry Melanson swears by can't stand a debate with an expert on the field of historical research concerning the Knights of Jesus as the real possessors of political power, and so can't he. There is no chance, so they won't try. <a href="http://www.savethemales.ca/000992.html">Henry Makow</a> does actually pretend to "wonder what the Jesuits' source of power is", playing not being able to make the connection between the radical loss of his Church's most important psychic instrument, the book, for political dominance based on <a href="http://worldpoliticalauthority.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-world-order-encyclical-1.html">"morale superiority"</a> through letterpress and following Protestant Reformation and – as last exit – the resurrection/refoundation of the Knights Templar with a new livery: Jesuit blackness. Sure, "why should anyone obey the" secret service, the SS/CIA of the Vatican? As a Catholic, to boot! Not mysticism, moneytheism rules in the eyes of Henry. As if the Catholic Empire had conquered Europe and the world with money instead of Jesus/Horus. Remember those blood-curdling secret oaths of the bankers ... Listen, Dear Sir, it's simply to memorize: mystery, military, <i>then</i> comes the money – it's always the same succession since the fuehrers were called "pharaohs", and "9/11" is the absolute paramount example for this little secret. What a job you have choosen! Not enviable at all. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1802&cpage=1#comment-77">11/22'09</a></center> <br />
This summer, <a href="http://www.podomatic.com/profile/iconoclastreport">Carolyn Harris</a> maybe could have delivered a pretty comprehensive little series on this particular issue on <a href="http://twitter.com/MysticPolitics">Mystic Politics'</a> "Online Radio" Podcast, in which, I think, she succeeded to back up statements such as done by <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/america-doesnt-have-president.html">Jordan Maxwell</a> ("Since Jesus isn't here, they own you <i>for</i> the Pope.") and <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/marc-stevens.html">Marc Stevens</a> ("What do they fear the most? Their perception of legitimacy.") with some considerably juicy arguments. Study materials are available, for instance, in the "old" <a href="http://nwolibrary.com/library/viewforum.php?f=73&sid=bf38c22281228056608f64da562c5f4a">library</a> or where <a href="http://civil-liberties.com/books">"America</a> bends over". <a href="http://mysticpolitics.com/mp3/Mystic_Politics_Radio_13.mp3">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://mysticpolitics.com/mp3/Mystic_Politics_Radio_14.mp3">Part 2</a> are titled "Constitutional Crisis and the Patriot Paradigm", <a href="http://mysticpolitics.com/mp3/Mystic_Politics_Radio_15.mp3">Part 3</a> then brings up the question: "Does the Constitution apply to you? Did it ever?" The second part is a true launching from the inception. Two further recommendations were the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov">Thomas</a> section of the Library of Congress and <a href="http://www.findlaw.com">FindLaw.</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9lUAuS1DK0">05/28'09</a> Eric Jon Phelps with Nick and Everett, Orwell's Ghost calling in <br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGNZIEzYo5M">06/04'09</a> Eric B. Orwell, the ghost himself, with Everett Tucker and Nick Spero <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1802&cpage=1#comment-61">11/14'09</a></center> <br />
"Washington worked with them – <blockquote><p><a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03379c.htm">Principally responsible</a> for this change of attitude by Maryland was [Jesuit Alumnus] Charles Carroll, who was afterwards rewarded in being elected a delegate to the Continental Congress on the 4th of July. He took his seat on the 18th of July and signed the Declaration of Independence on the 2nd of August, when the copy engrossed on parchment was presented for signature. Of all the signers he risked the most.</p></blockquote>to establish the Republic." <br />
Now, Marc Stevens raises the question: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_cHslsPDzQ&fmt=18">"Is there a state</a> at all?" <br />
And not only this, but: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0o2GCT0z4Q">"Did anyone</a> <i>sign</i> the Constitution?" That very <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMYicq_SN1E&fmt=18">unique</a> constitution! <br />
How could one get these informations synchronized? <br />
<b>"Why do we not realize: it's just a damn piece of paper?!"</b> <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1603&cpage=1#comment-56">11/11'09</a></center> <blockquote><p>Personally known to me, Richard Grove is honest, eloquent and confrontational in his exposure of the powers running Wall Street. He is well aware of the Knights of Malta and their financial monopoly over the banks, lending institutions and the market.</p></blockquote>Good to hear, Sir. <br />
He would be my first choice to become the arbiter. A very premium candidate for the job and, in my eyes, one of the greatest inspirations out there on the web. I mean, this guy is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0AETzgZsD0&fmt=18">tremendous.</a> In 2006, it was him who got me <i>really</i> started with his <b>911Synchronicity</b> podcast. It was him who introduced me into the fields of investigative research à la Phelps, McKenna, Maxwell, Emory, Irvin, Hicks and others. <br />
This is from an interview with Keith "Vyzygoth" Hanson of Episode No. 15. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://renaissance.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=161991">12/15'06</a> @171min, Richard) Well, here is how I kind of see it. So, I can make it clear. From my understanding, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Empire">British Empire</a> was under the control of the Vatican, and you can see this in the symbolism: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKG59NUdn8A">an over head shot</a> of the Vatican out in front the obelisk, you'll see an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Jack">Union Jack.</a> <b>So, the flag of Britain is that of the over head shot of the Vatican.</b> Now, there is other symbols from the over head shot, but that's one of them. So from that you had the 1922 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11th">September 11th</a> British mandate over Palestine to create a future Zionist state, which is Israel in the future. <b>That you then have the same people participate in the funding of the Nazis and the creation of the Holocaust, the persecution of the Jews, in order to justify creating this British Vatican stronghold and populating it with Jewish people as an asylum, basically – to use a little Templar symbolism.</b> It's an asylum: a save place for the Jews to go. Now, you also have the creation of Zionism that makes () stay on Israel. You then have, after the creation of Israel, the creation of the CIA by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Knights_of_Malta">Reinhard Gehlen,</a> who is a Nazi, funded by the same people that are creating it. And Gehlen also founds the Mossad! <b>So, the Mossad and the whole Jewish question rolls back up to the same people who had been creating states and money systems, and control systems, and mapping out the planet for the past eleven centuries.</b> That's how I see it. <br />
<br />
@174min, Keith) To be honest with you, <b>I don't think the United States ever really was all that free from Britain. The</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War">Revolutionary War</a> <b>didn't accomplish anything to the most part</b> – that's another whole thing. So when you look at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1783)">Treaty of Paris,</a> that I would ask people to read, [...] Then we've got a central bank here that – obviously – the colonists never wanted, because they knew that scam by the central bank in England by the Rothschilds. And also then <i>that</i> happened. <b>So they get their tentacles into us through the banking.</b> And I'm not blaming British people, I'm just saying that I think <a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=197#comments">Cecil Rhodes</a> was right, when he said that we have to bring the U.S. back into () crown and make them the dumb beast to fight the wars that our best () can no longer do. And therefore you look at WW I and II [...] I think what happened is <b>we'd become the</b> <a href="http://images.google.de/images?q=Roman+Legion">Roman Legions</a> <b>for the 20th and 21th century, and I think really, that we are the New World Order – our military is been abused. But for a particular purpose.</b> That's very frightening. [...] <br />
<br />
The whole idea of Columbia ... when <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2508190/the_obama_deception_barackhenaten">Freeman</a> was on and we were talking about that, I used to say like 'what is Columbia come from'? <b>I mean, what is 'Columbia'? District of Columbia, Columbia this, Columbia that – where does this fit into the whole scheme of the founding of this country?</b> And then you realize that that's a female image that goes back to the representation of Isis. [...] <a href="http://images.google.de/images?q=%22Statue%20of%20Liberty%22">Statue of Liberty</a> [...] So, I'm looking at the U.S. – and I sent you that book by Wilcox, <b>The Transformation of the Republic,</b> not that Phelps doesn't do this also with <b>Vatican Assassins</b> – but <b>then you start to find the real deal: that the Vatican hated the U.S. because it was an extension on the Protestant Reformation.</b> Which always bug them. Secondly, the monarchies hated the U.S., 'cause, you know, 'come on, we don't want this spirit of constitutional republicanism coming over here.' Hence the <a href="http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/verona.htm">Secret Treaty of Verona</a> in 1822, it's like 'we're not gonna let this happen here, guys'. <b>So, where we felt we were loved, we've always been hated.</b> And, basically, they got us back during the Civil War, which is another whole story. And then in the afterward, more and more, <b>we were basically used by the landed and generational powers from Europe – to include both the Vatican and the Crown. I really do believe that we were raised up to be a pitbull for old wealth.</b> And I think eventually what will happen, as happened with Napoleon's armies and Hitler's: after you take a scorcher, and they've done their job, you got to get rid off them. [...] And probably we ever do leave Iraq, the U.N. will come in and never leave, the Pope's army.<br />
<br />
@182min, Richard) The U.S. was set up as an experiment, and France was also set up as an experiment, but there was a different variation. Because the elite was trying to figure out, 'how we can have total control of the people in such a way that they won't even think that they're enslaved, and they won't revolt, therefore.' That they can have permanent control. <b>So, they are doing these different experiments, whether it's communism, or socialism, or capitalism, or it's the US version, where it's a heavy military state, or the French version, where it's a very light military state.</b> They are just working on these different versions to take the synthesis out of that and say: allright, here is the model for a New World Order control. [...] I think, there is a race against time right now, while they try to figure out the final combination of how to suppress people. [...] That's where the hope is. The hope is that people are waking up and they're refusing the artificial construct that's being provided by corporate mass media. And it's very much like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sZAv71ENnY&fmt=18">The Matrix</a> in that sense. <br />
<br />
@186min, Keith) What's also not known is that the Vatican seeks a second Holy Roman Empire. Not so much through Roman Legions, but through this <b>Veneer of Religiosity.</b> <br />
<br />
@189min, Richard) Well, and I'd even take this a step further and say this: I tell Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope all the time, I think, it's a great book. And I was very moved when I found out that book was there and had been suppressed, and I discovered it and had a lot of information. <b>However, where was Carroll Quigley from?</b> He is from Georgetown! <b>He is a professor from Georgetown that taught Clinton.</b> So, he works in a Jesuit university. <b>So here you are: another layer to the cake.</b> 'Cause I went and found that stuff, I was like, 'oh, that's pretty clever,' because not a lot of people mentioned that. They'll tell you about Quigley but they won't say that, you know, he is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6-qBhxNRnk&fmt=18">a Jesuit professor.</a> And when you make those discoveries for yourself, you want not only to share it with other people, but you want other people to realize <i>what that means,</i> because <b>that raises your intellect in this game another level higher:</b> that you're discovering, 'oh, I see how the people up here are controlling all of these layers' [...] It's an interesting dynamic when you take it on context.<br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-91329738862507764682009-11-15T23:46:00.002+01:002009-11-15T23:46:15.901+01:00Eric Shine<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=7369351804936864104#">Eric Shine:</a> <font color="#cc0000">Whistleblowers</font> – Americans who expose the truth <br />
<br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-1934514241545172568#">Eric Shine:</a> Globalization <br />
<br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-1927068784206080593#">Eric Shine:</a> New World Order & North American Union <br />
<br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4793815877266567415#">Eric Shine:</a> <font color="#cc0000">Is America Being Sold Out From Within?</font> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-1686343416745149991#">Eric Shine:</a> US Navy, US Merchant Marine, and US Coast Guard's use of Military Tribunals<br> <br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-22698401374450514912009-11-13T12:56:00.015+01:002009-12-02T00:24:15.678+01:00Investigative Journal comments 1<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
<a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1264&cpage=1#comment-179">11/12'09</a> </span> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" size="4"><b>Were Washington and Papist John Carroll good buddies?</b></font> <span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
"Their blood flowed as freely to cement the fabric of independence as that of any of their fellow-citizens. They concurred with perhaps greater unanimity than any other body of men in recommending and promoting that government from whose influence America anticipates all the blessings of justice, peace, plenty, good order, and civil and religious liberty." <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykYVIUk-mqs&fmt=18">State</a> <b>is the continuation of Church by other means.</b> <br />
<br />
What would if <a href="http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/11/confirmed-defense-spending-creates-less.html?showComment=1258034173337#c350974064432343858">Georg</a> could <a href="http://vimeo.com/5726046">hear us?</a> <br />
<br />
</span> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" size="4"><b>Catholics don't care about freedom. <br />
Not. <br />
A. <br />
Bit.</b></font> <span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
Like Communists. <br />
They both are like the Ancient Egyptians. They <i>want</i> to be shephered. <br />
<br />
They wouldn't <i>dare</i> to think of being not less smart than their <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/252747/october-27-2009/holy-water-under-the-bridge---randall-balmer">cute</a> asexual Jesus-like brotherhood. They wouldn't dare to think they possibly could know slightly better than what they get preached from their priests all the time. So all you need to do as the Chief Executive Officer of the Institution of Inquisition is to restage the Reichstag fire in front of their eyes, combined with elements of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpNDITTnHBs&fmt=18">Pearl Harbor</a> ("coincidentally" <i>also</i> the summer blockbuster of 2001) and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1JFCpFd6CA&fmt=18">Hiroshima/Nagasaki,</a> and the Catholic Columns, the holy "angelic hosts" of Catholic lay people, marche more or less all by themselves, quasi automatically, in the acquired direction against the assumed archenemy, the Jews, from whom they've gotten their book anyway. With one single beat of the drum you mobilize an army of millions of bloggers who are passionately confusing the new communication sphere with "outrageous conspiracy theories", thus providing a tremendously successful remake of the Hitleresque "Jewish World Conspiracy", now with digital means, so-called "Data Highways". <br />
<br />
"That thing that could not happen <i>has,</i> indeed, <a href="http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2009/11/saving-new-socialistcommunist-america.html">happened in America.</a> [...] something else showed up in America for the first time – <a href="http://www.dogpile.com/dogpile/ws/results/Web/!22a%20spectre%20is%20haunting%20europe%20the%20spectre%20of!22/1/417/TopNavigation/Relevance/iq=true/zoom=off/_iceUrlFlag=7?_IceUrl=true">something</a> very ugly." <br />
<br />
Former <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rauni-Leena_Luukanen-Kilde">Finnish Minister</a> of Health speaks out on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTgyakGAddM&fmt=18">Swine Flu scandal</a> and about "The Elite" <br />
<br />
"The patriotic part which Papists took ..." <br />
As always, Greg, <i>magnificent</i> investigative work. Thank's a lot for both articles around the <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/america-doesnt-have-president.html">corporation's president's</a> presumable Jesuitism! <br />
<a href="http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03381b.htm">Bishop Carroll</a> is extremely important for an appropriate understanding of the whole situation. <br />
"He <a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/?p=1603#comment-56">loved republicanism.</a> [...] There was an irresistible charm and elegance indeed in his conversations." <br />
The two main Roman "weapons of piety" I found out so far are the <a href="http://jesuitorder.blogspot.com/2009/10/balsam-of-words.html">"balsam</a> of words" and the <a href="http://satanicvatican.blogspot.com/2009/11/where-most-powerful-get-most-watertight.html">fabrication</a> of holy heros. Because <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/secret-societies-operate-through.html">piety</a> is the key. <br />
<br />
"You have to know <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/10/shill-and-demon.html">as much as you can</a> about what's going on at the top to know what to do at the bottom." <a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/audio/2009/2009-LRN/10-2009-LRN/GSIJ.102009_070500.MP3">Richard Bell</a> <br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC; font-size:120%"; align="center">A concordat with the Vatican is like dancing with the devil</h3><br />
<a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=979&cpage=1#comment-62">03/25'09</a> In the words of <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/866253/posts">Richard Bennett:</a> <blockquote><p><b>The Pope authorized the invasion of Ireland and sent the King a Ring of Investiture as Lord of Ireland.</b> <br />
Ireland was <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/866253/posts?page=88#88">conquered</a> for Papal profit: <br />
<font color="#cc0000">The fact is that many Irish Catholics find it hard to accept that the Church of Rome, as a temporal and feudal institution, was not a friend to the Irish nation.</font> It is hard to accept that there was something other to the Church of Rome than its professed "spirituality". The Popes regarded themselves as temporal princes, with more feudal power than most emperors, and they often led their own armies into battle to assert that power and reap tribute from those they subjected. [...] <br />
So it is quite clear that when Ireland became just another province of the Angevin Empire, with its High King having accepted Henry II as his feudal lord – that is <i>Dominus Hiberniae</i> (Lord of Ireland) – <b>Ireland had, in fact, constitutionally become a Papal fiefdom. The Bishops of Rome, as temporal feudal princes, had conspired in the conquest of Ireland, asserting themselves as feudal lords of all the lands of Europe. In this position, they were able to give Ireland into the charge of Henry II in return for payment.</b> [...] <br />
Ireland continued to be a Papal fiefdom, at the whim and gift of the Bishops of Rome, but with the English kings as middlemen. The Irish kings and princes were instructed, on pain of excommunication, to obey the authority of the English kings. It was in 1534 that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_VIII_of_England">Henry VIII</a> broke with Rome. <font color="#cc0000">Yet the important year for Ireland was 1541 when Henry VIII, rejecting the title of "Lord of Ireland", styled himself King of Ireland (Rex Hiberniae) becoming the first English King to do so and making Ireland a separate realm from his kingdom of England. <br />
To achieve this, Henry VIII determined to pursue a policy which abolished all the Irish titles and styles of the kings, princes and nobility. The Irish aristocracy were forced to surrender their titles and, in turn, accept English titles, methods of land holding, English law, the English language and, of course, the Reformed Faith with Henry VIII as head of the new church.</font> If they did not do so, they were be eliminated or forced to flee into exile.</p></blockquote>So while today the <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=BuNCblSVAY4">Roman Empire</a> incorporates all of its further provinces with treaties called concordats, the Papacy has been enthroned its new provincials throughout the Middle Ages with the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Aura-Kings-Legitimacy-Bibliotheca-Intellectual/dp/1568591098">Ring of Investiture</a> making kings with rings to lords "by the grace of god". And while Alexandre Dumas portrayed his "Count of Monte Cristo" after the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_General_of_the_Society_of_Jesus">Superior General</a> being confronted with the Papal suppression order, couldn't therefore the Pope himself as the <a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-4106574677079572938#">"King of the Kings"</a> not been considered as a "Lord of the Rings"? <br />
<br />
From <a href="http://irishgrl.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/bush-prepares-for-dictatorship-wheres-the-outrage">Jerome Corsi's</a> C-Span interview on "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGMD4xi98B8&fmt=18">05/10'07</a> ...<br />
"This comes on the heels, this was done on May 9, it was signed on April 30, 2007: <b>President Bush – again without congressional approval – signed an agreement with the European Union in which he created a transatlantic economic council, a new cabinet level office. Again, no congressional approval of the office being created with the idea to economically integrate us with the European Union.</b> And it was co-signed [...]" <br />
I'm afraid this signature set extensive centralization procedures in motion although my search for more thorough informations on this agreement and the announced "economic council" hasn't had any success yet. <br />
Putting aside the fact that Bush officials have denied Congressman <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_gD25lwjAk&fmt=18">Peter DeFazio</a> from his duty to review classified White House documents that describe how the Administration plans to conduct the US government if martial law is declared, the thing that was much more critical from my point of view was what else happened on April 30, 2007: <blockquote><p>The Congress, by Public Law 85-529, as amended, has designated May 1 of each year as <b>"Loyalty Day"</b>. This Loyalty Day, and throughout the year, I ask all Americans to join me in reaffirming our allegiance to our Nation. <i>Now, therefore, I, George W. Bush,</i> President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2007, as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalty_Day">Loyalty Day</a>. I call upon the people of the United States to participate in this national observance and to display the flag of the United States on Loyalty Day as a symbol of pride in our Nation. <i>In witness whereof,</i> I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.</p></blockquote>Yes, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1">Illuminati Day</a>"! With greetings from the "righteous" brotherhood of Loyola … <br />
<a href="http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso88591&q=%2226%2C000+Pastors+for+Martial+Law+Continuity+of+Government%22&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=any">"26,000 Pastors</a> for Martial Law Continuity of Government" <br />
<br />
<center>The Inquisition was <a href="http://www.sspx.org/against_sound_bites/defense_of_the_inquisition.htm">a model of agreement</a> between the Church and the State</center> <br />
Let's hear some interesting and concordat-related thoughts on the state and church issue from a member of the notorious <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_St._Pius_X">Society of St. Pius X</a> which doggedly refuses to call the Dark Ages dark: <blockquote><p>In effect, the black legend of the Inquisition is the product of Protestant propaganda, which was passed down to the 18th century by the philosophy of the "enlightenment", to the 19th century by Masonic anticlericalism, and to the 20th by "Christian-democracy". <br />
Nevertheless, the most serious historical studies have henceforth recognized that the Inquisition was an honest tribunal, which sought to convert heretics more than to punish them, which condemned relatively few people to the flames, and which only employed torture in exceptional cases. However, the anti-inquisitorial myth still circulates in public opinion. [...] <br />
<b>The doctrine of the Syllabus, which recognized for the Church and for the State a power of constraint in religious matters, was in accord with Catholic tradition. Pope Leo X (1513-1521) specifically condemned Martin Luther's proposition which affirmed that the Church did <i>not</i> have the right to burn heretics.</b> <br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bellarmine">Bellarmine</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Su%C3%A1rez">Suarez</a> also defended the right of the Church to impose the death penalty, on condition that the sentence be executed by the secular power, that is to say by the State. St. Thomas Aquinas supported the use of constraint, even physical, to combat heresy. St. Augustine appealed to the Imperial [Roman] authority to suppress the Donatist schism by force. The Old Testament punished by death idolaters and blasphemers. <br />
<b>The power of constraint in religious matters rests upon the principle of the duties of the State toward the true religion. The divine law does not apply only to individuals, it must include all social life.</b> [...] <b>In the true Gospel there is nothing to be seen of that moral and doctrinal laxity which the modernists qualify as "tolerance" or as "liberty of conscience".</b> <font color="#cc0000">Christ was patient and merciful with repentant sinners, but He never recognized any right of error and He exposed obstinate propagators of error to public condemnation. The Inquisition adopted an attitude toward heretics comparable to that of our Lord.</font> [...] <br />
<br />
The anti-inquisitorial argument rests also upon a confusion between freedom of conscience and religious liberty. <b>The act of faith must be freely consented to, since it constitutes definitively an act of love toward God. A forced love cannot be a true love. That is why the Church has always been opposed to forced conversions.</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89pinal_print">Epinal's</a> famous image of the Spanish monk who is presenting a crucifix to an Indian while the conquistador threatens him with his sword, is yet another fruit of Protestant propaganda. If a few princes had occasionally forced the baptism of conquered peoples, as, for example, Charlemagne did in Saxony (ca. 780), this was done against the will of the Church. <br />
<font color="#cc0000">But if the Church recognizes the freedom of conscience of the individual in his innermost heart, if the individual is free, at the risk of his salvation, to refuse the faith, it does not follow that he can propagate his errors and thus lead other souls to hell. So, the Church respects the freedom of conscience of individuals, but not the freedom of expression of false doctrines.</font> [...] <br />
Nevertheless, while the Church denies in principle the right of public expression of false religions, she may not necessarily persecute them in practice. To avoid a greater evil, such as a civil war, the Church can tolerate the sects. This is what Henry IV did in promulgating the Edict of Nantes (1598) which granted a certain amount of liberty to the Protestants of France. <b>But this tolerance does not constitute a right. When political circumstances permit it, the State must re-establish the exclusive rights of Catholicism</b>, as Louis XIV did when he revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685. Moreover, the pope congratulated the "Sun King" for taking this action. <br />
Naturally, the traditional doctrine of the Church on religious intolerance is only applicable in those countries where the State is officially Catholic. <b>The harmony between priesthood and empire is the normal order of things in societies.</b> In this regard, the Inquisition was a model of agreement between the Church and the State, since the tribunal exercised a mixed jurisdiction, both religious and civil. [...] <br />
<br />
<b>The central idea which justifies the Inquisition is that heresy professed publicly is a crime similar to any other crime against the common law.</b> Religion being the foundation of morality, and morality being the foundation of the social order, it follows that a falsification of the faith leads, ultimately, to an offense against the social order. <font color="#cc0000">St. Thomas compared heretics to counterfeiters, who, during the Middle Ages, were condemned to the flames. Thus the State, as guardian of the public order, had the duty to combat heresy. But in its role of temporal power, it was not competent to distinguish between heresy and orthodoxy. For this, it had to rely upon an ecclesiastical tribunal.</font> [...] <br />
As in all wars, the Albigensian Crusade was the occasion of excesses. The taking of Béziers (1209) was a veritable massacre. It was impossible to distinguish the Cathari from the Catholics among the population of the city. <b>The papal legate, Arnold de Citeaux, was to have said, "Kill them all. God will recognize his own." The words are probably apocryphal and can be filed under the panoply of anticlerical commonplaces.</b> <font color="#cc0000">But they reflect all the same an undoubted fact: the Cathari, who had, for a long time, been drawing down the hatred of the people upon themselves because of their immorality and their practicing of usury, ran the risk of a general lynching.</font> <br />
But the Inquisition prevented this massacre by distinguishing between the heretics and the orthodox, and between the leaders and the followers, and by applying proportionate punishments to the diverse degrees of heresy. <br />
<b>Finally, the Inquisition was a humanitarian work. In severely punishing the leaders, she spared the mass of the Cathari, who were more victim of than responsible for the heresy.</b> In ferreting out the heretics who had gone underground, she prevented the renaissance of Catharism and of all the social and moral disorders that this doctrine provoked. [...] <br />
<br />
The inquisitorial procedure varied according to the country and the times, but a basic outline becomes clear. <b>In a general manner, one can say that the Inquisition left the heretic every chance to extricate himself, and only severely punished the "irreducibles," those who were pertinacious in their rejection of the Faith. The Inquisition sought to educate as much as to restrain.</b> Its action sometimes was more of a work of eradicating popular superstitions than of battling against subversion. The judicial procedure was always accompanied by solemn preachings. [...] <font color="#cc0000">The Inquisition did not have at its command a secret police or a network of spies. It counted upon the collaboration of the Catholic people, acting in this way more as a guardian of the social consensus than as an oppressive apparatus of the State.</font> [...] <font color="#cc0000">The Inquisition was not concerned with the conscience of the heretics, but only with their exterior action.</font> <br />
The Pope confided the Medieval Inquisition to the Dominicans and the Franciscans. These two newly founded orders gave serious guarantees of probity and sanctity. <b>The theological and canonical knowledge of the inquisitors was remarkable. In fact, the Inquisition was entrusted to the finest flowers of the clergy of the era.</b> [...] <br />
The Inquisitor did not render his judgment alone. He was assisted by some assessors (assistant judges), selected from the local clergy. <b>The Inquisition was, in a way, the beginning of the institution of the jury system.</b> In addition, the bishop audited the sentences and the accused could appeal to the Pope. Thus the inquisitorial procedure was suitable, even by the standards of our modern criteria of justice. [...] The number of heretics burned by the Inquisition has been greatly exaggerated. [...] Jean Dumont speaks of about 400 executions during the 24 years of the reign of Isabella the Catholic. That's few indeed in comparison to the 100,000 victims of the purge of "collaborators" in France from 1944-45, or the <a href="http://one-evil.org">tens of millions</a> killed by the Communists in Russia, China, and elsewhere. <br />
<br />
The State's primary duty of charity is to protect the public order, to defend the physical and spiritual well-being of its subjects. If capital punishment is necessary to assure public security, the State or the Church can have recourse to it. <font color="#cc0000">The Catechism of the Council of Trent (chap. 33, §1) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church issued by John Paul II (art. 2266) recognize the legitimacy of the death penalty.</font> <br />
St. Thomas Aquinas justified the execution of criminals in noting that the fear of death often facilitated their conversion. Indeed, prison chaplains can bear witness to the fact that during the era that hanging still existed as a punishment in Canada, it was rare to see one of the condemned mount the scaffold without being confessed by a priest. <b>Thus, the temporal punishment of death allowed the criminal to avoid the eternal death penalty which is hell. In this way, the State was practicing true charity. To restore him to freedom, as is done today on the pretense of forgiveness, is to give the criminal the occasion of relapsing back into sin and losing his soul.</b> [...] At any rate, the death penalty constituted less than 1% of the sentences pronounced by the Inquisition. [...] <br />
The Inquisition was not charged with protecting persons and property from the various aggressions they might undergo. <b>It was created to prohibit a belief and a cult. Now we are at the heart of the matter.</b> [...] <br />
After all, the only thing that the liberals can still reproach the Inquisition for is having fought against the false religions. That is normal enough, since the liberals do not believe that the Catholic Church is the one way to salvation. <font color="#cc0000">They cannot comprehend the supernatural finality of the Inquisition.</font> [...] Recall that a third of the German population perished during the numerous religious wars which took place between 1520 and 1648. <b>If the burning of a few hundred heretics had enabled Spain to avoid such a conflict, one must conclude that the Holy Office performed a humanitarian act.</b> [...] <br />
But if there is not occasion to restore the Inquisition, one must certainly rehabilitate it in the eyes of history. With all due deference to those who love to see the Church disparage itself, <b>Catholics have nothing to be ashamed of in the past work of this holy tribunal.</b></p></blockquote>"The harmony between priesthood and empire is the normal order of things in societies …" <br />
This seems to me a more likely face of the Roman clergy in general. And while "the German Pope is trying <a href="http://www.ricksiegel.com/web2/node/108">desperately</a> to rewrite history", <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5961496076580102802#">outfoxed</a> anchorpeople are still believing they would do themselves a tremendous favor with what they're doing every day. <br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC; font-size:120%"; align="center">Obama's Jesuit connections surface</h3><br />
<a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=197&cpage=1#comment-49">03/21'09</a> Investigative dynamite! <br />
Many thanks for sharing your research mailbox and for the <a href="http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2009/2009-LRN/01-2009-LRN/0108-2009-LRN-Hr1.mp3">corresponding</a> January 8's Beacon Broadcast with EJP about the Jesuit surroundings of the Obama presidency which begins with: <font color="#cc0000">"You have to remember that the Pope has his <i>International Intelligence Community</i> which is the modern day Holy Office of Inquisition, and that International Intelligence Community begun to be put together in WWII and was perfected during the Cold War.</font> And that Intelligence Community today is really overseen by the CIA in conjunction with the Britisch secret intelligence service. [...] <b>The Vatican controls Hamas, it controls Hisbollah through the CIA and the Vatican controls the Mossad through the CIA.</b> So, the Vatican controls both sides and the purpose for this neverending ceaseless warfare is to ultimately bring the Pope to world power in Jerusalem [...] <font color="#cc0000">This war has been financed and armed on both sides from the Pope's Intelligence Community overseen by the CIA</font>, and thus we see the Israeli and the US government – both controlled by the Vatican – had provided all the necessary weapons to launch this war." <br />
<a href="http://www.shatteringdenial.com/white_papal_masters.html">This amount of mismatch</a> to the Corporate Mainstream as well as to the Conspiracy Mainstream is therefore the one we're dealing with here. <br />
<br />
Why does the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9zbZ7UNfxA&fmt=18">majority of academics</a> deny to look into the "9/11" abyss? They all know perhaps <font color="#cc0000">Faust's pact with the devil</font> and found out that Goethe was introduced into the Bavarian brotherhood from which Jesuit illuminism then emanated into European and international freemasonry capturing and controlling the new upcoming scientific and economic elites. <br />
Aren't we all to nearly full extend mentally embedded in the fascicled intelligence of the highest ranks of the Jesuit Shepherd’s Fold? Isn't the whole fatherly attitude of any of their pseudo-religious business brotherhoods (Freemasonry, Mormons, Scientology and what not) till this day <font color="#cc0000">the ideational core of social loyalty</font> at all? Don't we all unwittingly posess their corporate identity, that artificial legal business personality, as some existential sort of social compagnon and supervisory staff? <br />
Which manager, bureaucrat or officer has and shows any interest in deep clarification of the murderous psycho attack in the early days of the new century? That ignorance has reasons behind it that are part of the truth about "9/11" too and far more important as all technical details of the crime itself! The aspect of conspiracy is of second rank in my eyes. For what we are confronted with first and foremost should be called devoutness or something. Television devoutness, politics devoutness, democracy devoutness, science devoutness and so on, church and agency devoutness. <br />
<b>Walter Burien calls the CAFRs the bible of the corporate system</b> that nobody else than the adepts and insiders should see. Isn't the trick not exactly the same the Catholic church played with its believers throughout the whole mediaeval times? <br />
<br />
<font color="#cc0000">The majestic-dignity of interpretation delivers the central key to power whatsoever, and that’s probably one of the most important secrets of the mysterious Jesuit supremacy, I think.</font> What's the difference, let's say, between freedom as "the insight into necessity" (Friedrich Engels, the high-level Freemason) and the famous letter Loyola wrote – "de virtute obedientiae" – on March 26, 1553, where he defined the three degrees of "Manchurian Candidate" obedience towards the next superior brother? Hoensbroech translated its main passages into German, <a href="http://www.st-bertoni.com/constitutions_files/obedience_app.pdf">the last sentence</a> goes like: "I beseech you by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ [...] <b>bestir you to subjugate (expugnare) and subdue (subicere) the most highbred and difficult part of your mind: reason and judgement."</b> <br />
<br />
<h3 style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC; font-size:120%"; align="center">Jesuit motivated Internet propaganda deceives millions</h3><br />
<a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1033&cpage=1#comment-47">03/20'09</a> "I am the best you can get!" <br />
The self-appointed "T-Rex of Political Talk" in his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrblDZf1M-4&fmt=18">own words</a>. <br />
"The tip of the spear. [...] the ultimate resistance." I know how it hurts. <br />
After all, he's the most efficient gatekeeper of the Roman N.W.O., that damn <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxifKxQ_8fA">fricking</a> Jones joker! <br />
Good article and nice try, Tom. I call him <b>the big instantaneous water heater</b>: <font color="#cc0000">lots of hue and information with very little useful coherence.</font> <br />
Do you know what happend on <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1056628989792219350#">May 14, 2008</a> on his show? The videos of the interview with <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8650388142552941421#">David J. Smith</a> that I downloaded from Youtube months ago have been unfortunately deleted, meanwhile. <br />
I think he acts like a Lewis Prothero but in a sneaky twisted kind of inverted way introducing the Jesuit "prison planet" by negative advertisement, in a manner of speaking, while concurrently sustaining the Corporate Mainstream the tried and tested dialectical way. Together with Tarpley and a formidable row of generally accepted "truth heros", Alex became the strongest public relations anchor of that type of future he reputedly fights against. His role had to be custom-made for the goals that are being pursued with the "9/11" project, and that's the ultimate question from my point of view: for what exact reason was that psycho tsunami absolutely unevitable? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW8W1pV9pes&fmt=18">May 15, 2007</a> Eric Jon Phelps with Lenny Bloom <br />
Eric) Alex Jones is the topic: He refuses to deal with the Jesuit order. <br />
Lenny) They don't want the truth to get out. They are hiding the truth. <br />
Right. But the deception here is his great credibility on most every other topic: on "9/11", the demolition of the WTC, Oklahoma City, you know, the whole nine yards, the destruction of Waco – he is absolutely credible on all those other topics. And that's what suck the people into following him away from Vatican control. <br />
Lenny) <font color="#cc0000">That's a half-truth. That's how he gets people.</font> <b>Create a half-truth, hook them in!</b> <br />
Eric) <b>So this is typical Jesuit casuistry at its best, and we always have to watch out for this and be aware that there is always somebody trying to seduce the listener away</b> from realizing that Rome is the mother of harlots and the abominations of the earth: Rome is that great city which rules all the kings on the earth. <br />
<font color="#cc0000">So, and I would welcome a debate with Alex Jones. I'll welcome any confrontation with him, if he seeks to refute me about this or correct me for final analysis.</font> <b>All I ask is that he deals with the Jesuit order. It doesn't have to be me, I'm nothing. But that subject is everything, and he must deal with it if he use to maintain his credibility.</b> <br />
Lenny) Well, he has to stay in the shadows. He can't afford to let the light shine on and has to stay under his rock. <font color="#cc0000">And the thing is this, he will not enter into any</font> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmmZ5WVWBH0">neutral debate</a> <font color="#cc0000">with you. He'll have to have his finger on the button at his radio station. He is too frightened and he doesn't have the debating expertise or intelligence or lateral thinking enough to move into that area of expertise and go one on one with you. But he can buster and fuel people with cleverly devised fables. Alex Jones is a Jesuit coadjutor, a fake.</font> <br />
Eric) That's absolutely right.<br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-18223079711122420292009-11-09T23:55:00.006+01:002009-12-07T01:34:00.416+01:00Marc Stevens<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
If you consider yourself a citizen of the United States of America, or of any other country, you should not watch this video until you have mentally prepared yourself to have everything you believe in challenged. You have been warned. <br />
What if everything you believed in turned out to be just a set of delusions programmed into you from early childhood? How would you react upon learning this? Most people will go into denial and get very highly emotional, even to the point of violence. You are probably no exception. <br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://marcstevens.net">Marc Stevens,</a> the guy who rips your reality from you: <a href="http://vimeo.com/5726046">Delusions</a></center><br />
<a href="http://beyondthegrassyknoll.com/audio/136-Adventures%20in%20Legal%20Land-Marc%20Stevens.mp3">On the Knoll</a> – Adventures in Legal Land <br />
<div style="text-align:justify">@51min) Like I say, anything done under the guise of consent can be done by consent. And really, the only ... I always urge people: go in or buy the movie <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Bug%27s_Life">A Bug's Life</a> because it's not a children's video. It graphically demonstrates the government fraud. It's an exellent video or cartoon and it describes <i>to the key</i> what we have been talking about. [...] <b>The solution is simple, is withdraw your participation as far as you can. I wouldn't vote.</b> I would never register to vote because it's giving legitimacy to a gang of killers, thiefs and liars. I would pull my kids out of public school. If I had to pay taxes, I () right on there on the protest. And whatever could be done to withdraw legitimacy ... <b>I mean, could you just imagine if people just didn't help them?</b> They don't oppose them in any way, they just didn't <i>help</i> them anymore: 'Oh, you think you have a right to control my life and property without my consent? Oh, then you certainly don't need my help. <b>If you don't need my permission, you don't need my help.'</b> Can you imagine how the traffic system would function if nobody helped them? [...] Fighting them is not effective because that just gives them legitimacy: 'Well, we have to protect other people the more you fight and picking up guns and going after these people.' They have more guns, and that gives them legitimacy. But: <b>What do they fear the most?</b> And that is: <b>Their perception of legitimacy.</b> You know, people go on: 'We've gotta go back to the Constitution!' <b>No. That's the problem. Your problem is that you're giving legitimacy to a gang of killers, thiefs and liars,</b> and whenever you look at the Constitution, or whenever you accept the 'Oh, it's just a few bad apples, it's we can just pull this guy out, everything would be perfect!' No. <b>If you stop accepting this religion called politics. Clear your mind of it!</b> I mean, hey, I left the Catholic Church and, unlike the way it used to be, they are not sending the Jesuits out to murder me where I stand.</div><br />
<a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=7238921269249750961#">Adventures in Legal Land,</a> where black is white and white is black and other shocking discoveries from America's courtrooms <br />
<br />
<a href="http://freestateproject.org/intro/choosenh">Free</a> State Project <br />
<br />
<a href="http://c4ss.org">Center</a> for a Stateless Society <br />
<br />
Drug war <a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=198325969631851603#">is a scam</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Stevens_(radio_host)">Wikipedia</a> <br />
<br />
WTPRN Radio <a href="http://www.wtprn.com/archives.html#Marc">Archive</a><br> <br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-1335337340112166782009-11-09T23:54:00.003+01:002009-12-10T09:34:50.101+01:00Christopher Strunk<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
Lopo) <br />
<a href="http://911epicfail.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-york-is-new-jerusalem-and-this-is.html">12/09'09</a> New York is the New Jerusalem and this is our town (IJ:09/18'09) <br />
<a href="http://ifjonknew.blogspot.com/2009/10/they-should-be-registered-as-dangerous.html">10/18'09</a> Should be registered as a dangerous weapon (IJ:08/13'09) <br />
<br />
Investigative Journal interviews) <br />
<a href="http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2009/2009-LRN/11-2009-LRN/GSIJ.110209_070500.MP3">11/02'09</a> <br />
<a href="http://arcticbeacon.com/audio/2009/2009-LRN/05-2009-LRN/GSIJ.052209_070500.MP3">05/22'09</a> <br />
<br />
Conversations with H.H. Channer: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz1RW1Pcsz0">08/11'09</a> & <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF27VLWbppA">06/26'08</a> <br />
<br />
06/05'09 on Speak Up <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7rZIjgQjk&fmt=18">Part 1</a> & <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JbGpc_DOqc&fmt=18">Part 2</a><br> <br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-38120685305640435712009-11-04T23:54:00.009+01:002010-10-01T06:28:13.775+02:00Vyzygoth Keith Hanson<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
<a href="http://pietyandloyalty.blogspot.com/2009/12/beyond-grassy-knoll.html">The Knoll</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3063#comment-10846">11/13'09</a> <br />
Apropos Corsi and "The Bush legacy? European socialism.", can anybody perhaps associate that on <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/investigative-journal-commentaries-1.html">April 30, 2007</a> signed agreement about "a transatlantic economic council" with the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet">new cabinet?</a> Because it can't be the one with Skull and Bones <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Economic_Advisers">Goolsbee,</a> and I'd like to presume that this "agreement" – never heard of it again since then – could have been something <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/america-doesnt-have-president.html">much bigger</a> than C-Span had told about with regard of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sw0Ap5mW_9A&fmt=18">Queen's visit</a> only a few days later and the proclamation of the most ominous <b>"Loyola Day" on May 1,</b> the day after. <br />
<br />
By the way, <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/secret-societies-operate-through.html">great interview,</a> Vyzygoth! <br />
If I may ask you a particular question about the "locked head" you spoke of: why do you think, "the truth" would be something that has to be believed? Because of its religious nature? <br />
You know, McKenna's phrase was: <font color="#cc0000">"If the truth can be told so as to be understood, it will be believed."</font> The same thing, isn't it? <br />
I don't see it that way, I can't. <br />
("The Conspiracy is us" because "the conspiracy" is a fractal phenomenon.) <br />
And the thing with this "peering-behind-the-veil" channel of Greg, the "Rochester" guy, seems to me to be an almost openly Catholic/Freemasonic/Theosophical/Scientological – what cultish ideologies/memestreams have you – podcast when you listen, for example, to <a href="http://www.occultofpersonality.net/mitch-horowitz-and-%E2%80%9Coccult-america%E2%80%9D-pt-2">episode 71.</a> <br />
<br />
@22min, Mitch) To me, this material really humanizes <a href="http://www.josephsmithjr.org">Joseph Smith.</a> It explains to me a little bit of where he comes from, helps me <i>see</i> him as a fuller figure, and that was a great surprise, and in many respects a delightful surprise, to find him, and to be able to locate him within the occult history that I explore in <i>Occult America</i>. And I would suggest that, you know, all this material to me deepens and broadens the person that he was. <b>I think, he was a remarkable man.</b> And some of this material is offensive and challenging to people within LDS today, but I would say that this is material that enriches and deepens – it doesn't in any way <i>detract</i> from who Smith was. It helps set him in a context, a great American context. And people can have the virgin beliefs about the figure he was and the man he was, but it's not necessary for any of the richness of his background to be seen as something that detracts or compromises his greatness. In fact, to me it builds it. <br />
Greg) Yeah, I agree completely by viewing it in this context, as you mentioned it. It definitely – as you said – humanizes him. It allows us to see what he did, the life he lived, the church that he helped found. <br />
Mitch) Many outsiders to the Mormon Church have a hard time understanding where some of the ideas, the concepts, the historical timeline that you find in the Book of Mormon, where all this comes from. To some people it seems very alien.<br />
<br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-68820841240495604862009-10-27T23:56:00.007+01:002009-12-14T11:40:19.194+01:00Freemen on the Land<span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> <br />
<a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/11/marc-stevens.html">Marc Stevens</a> <br />
<br />
shenanigans with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQzjZZC_u8w&fmt=18">"everything is ok"</a> sign <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.tpuc.org/node/389">John Harris:</a> Freedom <a href="http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1001&cpage=1#comment-44">is an</a> Illusion. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-7040453665540929835#">Bursting</a> Bubbles <br />
<br />
Global Commerce Game: <a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=6350663046685638598#">Start Winning</a> the Game <br />
<br />
Intro to Your <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUs2MW6a9aQ">Human Rights</a> <br />
<br />
Irene-Maus: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCE4gkCUT78">Gravenhorst</a> <br />
<br />
Luke-Michele: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI0KsUdS8oM">Denis</a> <br />
<br />
Robert-Arthur: <a href="http://www.thinkfree.ca">Menard</a> <br />
<br />
</span> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" size="4"><b>When you know where you are, it is much easier to consider ways to achieve your desired destination.</b></font> <span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"> The object of this <a href="http://www.detaxcanada.org">webpage,</a> and <font color="#cc0000">Detax Canada</font> is to inform you as to how you have been made a <b>Slave</b> subservient to the <b>Crown</b> of the <a href="http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation">City of London,</a> and thus, its owner the <a href="http://communio.stblogs.org/2009/04/saint-pius-v-pope.html">Pontiff of Rome</a> and his <b>Holy Roman Empire,</b> the original and origin of what is called <b>Fascism</b> and <b>Collectivism.</b> <br />
If you are not familiar with what <b>Fascism</b> means, note the meaning of the Roman symbol called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces">"fasces"</a> from whence the term Fascism comes.<br />
If you are not familiar with what <b>Collectivism</b> means, watch <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0o2GCT0z4Q">this 5 part</a> video presentation <br />
<font color="#cc0000">"Individualism</font> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMYicq_SN1E&fmt=18">versus</a> <font color="#cc0000">Collectivism"</font> researched by G. Edward <a href="http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=6276223916862531753#">Griffin.</a> <br />
<br />
Freedom Force <a href="http://www.realityzone.com/freedomforce.html">International</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.spanglefish.com/freemanscotland">Dave Allison</a><br />
<br />
</span>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2040198583963235215.post-83402829790637173522009-10-22T11:56:00.007+02:002009-12-02T00:26:26.134+01:00Good Jesuit Bad Jesuit comments 1<div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Sylfaen; font-size:130%"><br />
<a href="http://goodjesuitbadjesuit.blogspot.com/2009/10/society-of-jesus-in-service-to-our.html?showComment=1256204170150#c3273472606635240917">In service to the saviour</a> <br />
<br />
Therefore the Monotheistic "saviour's" ( <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/7hunder/2009/06/23/TVP-RADIO">Horus in form of Jesus</a> ) most important lesson is: Be obedient. Shut off your brains. Synchronize your will with the one of your superior. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQtHegXI8Ps&fmt=18">Serve the system.</a> Pray for your God, Rome's <i>shining</i> ("white" pope) World Pharaoh, and his master, the <i>invisible</i> ("black" pope) "Christus quasi praesens". Be the <a href="http://jesuitorder.blogspot.com/2009/09/jesuits-have-it-all-under-control.html">abolute</a> perfect subject. Be politically "blind". <b>That's catholic salvation of the highest degree, isn't it?</b> Like "his holiness, brother/father" Ignatius "the fiery", aka <a href="http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/10/are-you-patriot-or-coadjutor.html">"Don Quixote"</a> as well as <a href="http://www.alphamusic.de/shop/home/artikeldetails/ID2925863.html">"The Count of Monte Cristo",</a> wrote in detail about <font color="#cc0000">the first rule of his Fight Club</font> in his famous letter "de virtute obedientiae" in 1553. The old (Egyptian, totalitarian) <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=M552sDe6Ie8&fmt=18">sheep-shepherd game</a> … <br />
Can you name me one Catholic, just one catholic soul alive who thinks about <a href="http://the-conspiracy-is-us.blogspot.com/2009/09/they-want-to-be-slaves.html">freedom</a> even rudimentally? Because the lack of this is the reason why for me <a href="http://www.christusbruderschaft.de">Communism</a> rhymes with <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=BorBq2dBUiE&fmt=18">Communion,</a> you know. <br />
<blockquote><p>Unlike most important movements, the one which took form in the Society of Jesus was not, as the phrase goes, "in the air", it was conceived in the brain of a single man, Ignatius Loyola. Reform was in the air but the method adopted was Loyola's own creation. A young knight full of martial ardour, he was struck down in battle. When he rose from his sickbed, it was with a resolution to exchange earthly for heavenly warfare. There had been soldiers of the Cross before, but they had fought with the arm of flesh. <b>The new idea was, to introduce military organisation into the warfare of the spirit.</b> The utter obedience of the soldier to his superior officers is the principle that makes armies invincible, it was the beginning and the middle and the end of the association that Loyola conceived. Obedience to the right rule of life is enjoined upon all men. Obedience to the rules of an order is enjoined upon members of the order, not only obedience to these, but submission absolute, unquestioning, unhesitating to every injunction from a superior officer was to be the fundamental law of the society. <br />
<font color="#cc0000">Even in Loyola's own mind the idea did not take immediate and final shape.</font> For years he gave himself up to a personal training which should fit him for the end he had in view: prayer and fasting, study and travel, the subjugation of the flesh, the education of the brain, the purification of the spirit, to these he devoted himself.</p></blockquote>Thanks for this terrific citation ( <a href="http://a-conspiracy-so-monstrous.blogspot.com/2009/09/internet-archive.html">One more book!</a> ). <font color="#cc0000">"A power with a single eye"</font> to <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html">"caritas in veritate",</a> "world political authority" – <b>The Planetary Dominion.</b> Published on 7/7'09, mainly for a people of <a href="http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2005/04/more-on-eric-jon-phelps-aka-eric-jon.html">"devout Papists"</a> of the seize of <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20797485/chinas_allseeing_eye">China.</a> Monotheistic Catholicism (Solidarism/Peschism) and Atheistic Communism (Socialism/Marxism) are principally (spiritually, psychologically, ideologically) the same, as combines and corporations are the same economically – I'm working on it. <br />
"The Roman Catholic Church <a href="http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=O8HUVYDLV_Y">will rule the world again."</a><br />
<br />
</span></div>Tosco Weberhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02374232193269306764noreply@blogger.com3